1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Aleksandr [31]
3 years ago
5

Explain the differences between civil trials and criminal trials. Your response should be at least 150 words

Social Studies
2 answers:
Natasha_Volkova [10]3 years ago
8 0

A civil trial is when a person or entity sues somebody for one or more reasons. For example, a person can be civilly sued if they cause a car crash, and cause injuries. Civil lawsuits can be brought in both state and federal court, individuals, corporations, or governments can bring civil lawsuits against persons or entities for violating civil or constitutional rights. An example of this would be somebody suing somebody else for not fulfilling a contract.

A criminal trial is generally charged in a formal accusation called an "indictment". The government, on behalf of the people of The United States, will prosecute this case through the United States Attorney Office if this person committed a federal crime. State's Attorney Offices handle state crimes. An example of this could be somebody committing a violent crime that results in the deaths or harm of others. In instances like this, it is typically up to the government to bring charges against this person, not the victims.

Ber [7]3 years ago
7 0

Answer:

  • <u>Civil Trial:</u>"<em>A trial in which a plaintiff seeks damages or other remedy from a defendant."</em>  
  • A civil lawsuit procedure consists of the rules by which courts carry out civil trials.
  • <u>Criminal Trial:</u><em>"A jury examines the evidence to decide whether, "beyond a reasonable doubt," the defendant committed the crime in question."</em>
  • After both sides have presented their arguments, the jury considers as a group whether to find the defendant guilty or not guilty of the crime(s) charged.

Explanation:

<u>It is important to understand what is a civil court case, and the process to expect.The order of events in the process of civil trials includes: </u>

  • <u>Opening statements</u>
  • <u>Presentation of evidence by plaintiff </u>
  • <u>Direct examination of witnesses </u>
  • <u>Cross-examination of witnesses </u>
  • <u>Dismissal motions, or motion for direct verdict </u>
  • <u>Presentation of evidence by defendant </u>
  • <u>Rebuttals by plaintiff </u>
  • <u>Final motions from defendant and plaintiff </u>
  • <u>Closing arguments by defendant and plaintiff</u>

<u>A complete criminal trial typically consists of six main phases, each of which is described in more detail below: </u>

  • <u>Choosing a Jury :</u>At this stage, both the defense and the prosecution may exclude a certain number of jurors, through use of "peremptory challenges" and challenges "for cause."
  • <u>Opening Statements:</u> Once a jury is selected, the first "dialogue" at trial comes in the form of two opening statements -- one from the prosecutor on behalf of the government, and the other from the defense.
  • <u>Witness Testimony and Cross-Examination</u> :At the heart of any criminal trial is what is often called the "case-in-chief," the stage at which each side presents its key evidence to the jury.
  • <u>Closing Arguments :T</u>he closing argument offers the government and defense a chance to "sum up" the case, recapping the evidence in a light favorable to their respective positions
  • <u>Jury Instruction :</u>The judge then decides what legal standards should apply to the defendant's case, based on the criminal charges and the evidence presented during the trial.
  • <u>Jury Deliberation and Verdict:</u>After receiving instruction from the judge, the jurors as a group consider the case through a process called "deliberation," attempting to agree on whether the defendant is guilty or not guilty of the crime(s) charged.

You might be interested in
Cual es la verdad sobre el uso de la tecnología hoy en día
miv72 [106K]

Answer:

What is the truth about the use of technology today

Explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
What are two things that the central government can not do and the states are responsible for
oksian1 [2.3K]

Answer:

Two of the exclusive responsibilities of the states in the United States are providing for public safety, health, welfare and regulating intrastate commerce.

Explanation:

The United States has a federal system where many of the day-to-day governing functions are under the jurisdiction of the individual states and the federal government has only certain exclusive powers like naturalization and declaring war.  Exclusive powers are those powers that are reserved to either the federal government or to the individual states themselves, they are not powers they share. Concurrent powers are powers shared by the federal government and the states.  Both the states and the federal government have the power to tax the citizens and to make laws as concurrent powers. Both the federal and state governments can also charter banks or borrow money.

5 0
3 years ago
A(n) __________ is a group of persons who have experienced a common social, political, historical, and economic environment.
damaskus [11]

Answer:

age cohort

Explanation:

The term that is being described in this question is known as an age cohort. To put it in other words this term refers to a group of individuals that were born around the same time period and are from a particular population that has typically shared certain events and experiences over the course of their lives. These events and experiences may be world events that happened during that time period of localized events due to being part of the same population.

7 0
2 years ago
which United States document defines a list of rights that are natural to which all persons are entitled
AlekseyPX
Your answer would be the Bill of Rights.
5 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why were enlightenment ideas never fully practiced by eighteenth century rulers
Ad libitum [116K]
Practicing those ideas meant a loss in the monarchs' power, which is something they would not like to happen
8 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Republicans proposed the Fourteenth Amendment
    14·1 answer
  • Help please no links i will give brainliest!!
    15·2 answers
  • What is the definition of Multilateral Agreement <br> in your own words
    12·1 answer
  • Most notable was the Morrill Act of 1862 which was responsible for the development of_________________.
    6·1 answer
  • In the Fawkes v. Texas trial, defense attorney Sunil Sharma wanted to question his defendant’s accuser in court. Which constitut
    7·2 answers
  • Who explored river congo​
    8·1 answer
  • Most campaign contributions for Texas legislature races come from
    10·1 answer
  • What were the protesting in portland or last weekend
    15·1 answer
  • Which of the following can sometimes be considered to be a constitutional principle? A Judicial review B Individual rights C Hab
    7·1 answer
  • If disclosure of a subject's involvement in a specific research study can be potentially harmful to the subject, and the consent
    9·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!