<span>Shinto focuses on the sacredness of the certain water source in each local community. Shinto encompasses local community practices and seasonal worship promoting agriculture in the community. The community also has a community shrine in which these practices are performed.</span>
Answer:
Peer testimony
Explanation:
A testimony is simply called a given statement by a person who possesses a reasonable or logical connection to the subject, field or topic and He or she must be a credible source. Mostly, it can be used to either clarify or prove a point.
Peer testimony can simply be defined as when a statement or testimony is being given by an individual who does not have expertise in the that particular area, field or subject that is in question. they can also be called antiauthorities because it's testimony source that is neither expert nor celebrity, but likely to the subject of an audience. Paul may not be an expert in that field but he has personal experience with the issue in question.
Answer: B. Ambiguous.
Explanation: Ambiguous simply refer to something unclear, having different interpretation or a statement or action that can be explained or viewed in multiple ways.
For example, a statement such as; "I have never tasted a soup such as this" or *did you see her shoes?"
This statement are ambiguous because it has many meanings to it.
The first statement is either commending the soup or discrediting it, Also the second statement was either asking how bad the shoes looks or how good looking they were.
The
Dust Bowl was the name given to the great plains region that was
devastated by the drought in the 1930s depression ridden America. By
the year 1940, more than 2.5 million people had fled from the regions
affected by the dust bowl. The dust bowl to the artist John Steinbeck
signified the final destruction of the old Jeffersonian ideal of
agrarian harmony with nature.
The
answer choice 2) is correct.
<span>I
hope this helps, Regards.</span>
T made political and economic sense for some to do so.
Explanation:
First off, not all Native Americans supported the French during the colonial wars. Most Algonquian speakers supported the French and most Iroquois supported the English. In general, the key concepts here are economic power and political power.
The fur trade dominated colonial relations from the Ohio Valley and the Upper Midwest. Whoever controlled the economy of that area would have both economic and political power. The Iroquois were positioned to control trade via the Great Lakes. Algonquian speakers were able to go around them and deal directly with Europeans. Iroquois leaders attempted to push into the interior using British guns while Algonquians pushed the Lakota out of Minnesota and onto the plains.
Many Algonquians intermarried with the French and created a new ethnic group, the Metis who also aligned with the French, in part, because both were Catholic.
