Answer:
13+t
Step-by-step explanation:
yes
Hey there :)
We know the formula for simple interest is
I = prt
{ The picture includes what each stands for }
Lehena:Initial amount = $100
Interest rate = 2.5% =

Time = 3 years
I = ( 100 )( 0.025 )( 3 )
= 7.5$
Total = $100 + $7.5 =
$107.5Marty:Initial amount = $100
Interest rate = 2% =

Time = 3 years
I = ( 100 )( 0.02 )( 3 )
= $6
Total = $100 + $6 =
$106How much more than Marty did Lehena receive?= Total Amount of Lehena - Total Amount of Marty
= 107.5 - 106
= $1.5Your answer will be option
B) $1.50
Answer:
Null hypothesis is: U1 - U2 ≤ 0
Alternative hypothesis is U1 - U2 > 0
Step-by-step explanation:
The question involves a comparison of the two types of training given to the salespeople. The requirement is to set up the hypothesis that type A training leads to higher mean weakly sales compared to type B training.
Let U1 = mean sales by type A trainees
Let U2 = mean sales by type B trainees
Therefore, the null hypothesis (H0) is: U1 - U2 ≤ 0
This implies that type A training does not result in higher mean weekly sales than type B training.
The alternative hypothesis (H1) is: U1 - U2 > 0
This implies that type A training indeed results in higher mean weekly sales than type B training.
Answer:
D is correct
Step-by-step explanation:
The opposite of a negative number is the positive version of it which is 3.5 and the absolute value of a number is always the positive version of a number which would make it also 3.5. For example absolute value of -4 is 4 and absolute value of 5 is 5.