Answer:
<em>Comparative politics is investigating internal processes within countries or political entities by comparing their characteristics according to a specific model.</em> Though it can potentially address a wide range of aspects, comparative politics is most widely applied to such <em>issues </em>as <u>politics of democratic and authoritarian states</u>, <u>political identit</u>y, <u>regime change</u> and <u>democratization</u>, <u>voting behavior</u> and a number of others.
<em>Comparativists often ask</em> how certain processes, for example, democratization, differ in specific states that still can be placed under the same analysis because they share certain characteristics.
Following the <u>democratization example</u>, let us take post-soviet countries. Comparativists may take most similar countries that share many similarities, such as Baltic states (Estonia, Latvia, Lithuania), or most different countries, such as Estonia and Belarus. Here comparativists may ask, why Estonia developed a strong democratic regime, while Belarus fell into a consolidated authoritarian regime.
Answer:
It brought electricity to rural areas; it contributed to the end of sharecropping; it helped modernize agriculture.
Explanation:
Georgia is one of the states that most benefited from Franklin D Roosevelt's New Deal because the President would summer in Warm Springs, Georgia. He knew some of the state's problems first hand. FDR implemented federal programs that paid farmers to stop producing cotton as a means to address the oversupply that was occurring and to raise the price. Roosevelt's intention was to help the tenant farmers and sharecroppers to become self-supporting small farmers and there were some local successes in that the New Deal was the first federal program that concretely helped rural residents to improve their farms and homesteads. Yet the small landowner was still outdone by the larger planters who took advantage of federal funds to mechanize their farms.
Answer:
Consumers and producers in a free market economy are "free" to produce and consume what ever they want, and demand for products dictates production--whereas in a command economy, producers are told how much to produce by the government.
Explanation:
In a free market economy is where the individuals who are the producers, make their own decisions on what products to produce and sell.In this type of market, the government does not intervene. The advantage of this system is that producers have full control to produce products of their choice and they are more multivated to work and produce goods to earn money.This also boosts the economy growth by allowing the total control to the producers who produce goods according to the demand of the market.
Bonus option: most profit
