Considering the available options, the statements that will likely lead to cost-push inflation include <u>"An increase in the price of oil has reduced supply of all goods and services that use oil as an input."</u>
The other options that will likely lead to cost-push inflation are "<u>Consumers become more comfortable with debt, increasing their spending as they take on more loans.</u><u>"</u>
<h3>What is Cost-Push inflation?</h3>
Cost-Push inflation is a type of inflation caused by the rise in the cost of wages and raw materials.
This implies that the rise in wages allows the consumers to spend more money on limited supply.
Also, when the rise in the cost of materials reduced the supply of all goods and services.
Hence, in this case, it is concluded that the correct answer is options A and E.
Learn more about Cost-Push inflation here: brainly.com/question/4540785
Answer:
Georgeland has an absolute but not a comparative advantage in producing clothing.
Explanation:
Absolute advantage is defined as the ability of a firm to produce higher amounts of a product as a result of use of the same resources with other competitors. It is usually bad a result of more efficient production process.
Comparative advantage is the ability of a firm to produce goods at a lower opportunity cost. Therefore they are able to sell at lower price compared to competitors.
Georgeland can produce 18 units of clothe per year while Alland can produce 16 units per year, so Georgeland has absolute advantage.
In producing clothes Georgeland has opportunity cost of 36 units of food which is higher than that of Alland which is 32 units of food. So Georgeland does not have comparative advantage in producing clothes.
The major reason that government control or regulation of railroads and large production entities because of monopolies. In the late 19th and early 20th centuries there was major growth in industries such as the railroad and oil industries in the United States, at this time companies became monopolies in these industries and thus there was pressure on the U.S. Government to weaken the control of these monopolies.
Yes, because firms produce where the marginal benefit to consumers equals the marginal cost of production.
