The above sentence changes to a passive voice, thus:
<em>"Their command of English should have increased considerably if sufficient time and attention were given by students to their work."</em>
The passive voice always follows this pattern: Object + Verb + By Phrase.
When the emphasis is not on the doer but the object of the action, the passive voice is used.
In the above sentence, the passive voice emphasized "their command of English" and "sufficient time and attention," which are objects of the sentence.
Students, who are the doers of the actions, were relegated to the background because the emphasis is not on the doers but the objects of the action.
Thus, the passive voice is always used when the object must be emphasized.
Learn more about the usage of the passive voice here: brainly.com/question/22047439
my hair was short a negative sentence
Answer:
Mum is not making salad
Mum is making biscuits
The grils are not drinking lemonade
the girls are drinking tea
Dad is not reading a newspaper
Dad is reading a cookery book
There is nothing to pick from. Sorry, I could've helped!
Even though Swift is not suggesting that the rich people in Ireland start eating the babies of the poor, he is still suggesting some realistic solutions. Most of all he is pointing out that the rich need to start doing something to balance out the economy and support the lower classes, instead of treating them like cattle. Comparing them to cattle by suggesting they eat babies points out this flaw of society and that it needs to be changed.
