Answer:
a) true.
Explanation:
In the present scenario, multidimensional leaders remain critically proactive to undertake strategic choices within a framework of continuously shifting situations and other relevant factors. In an ever-changing market world, leaders can not base themselves on traditional styles and aspire to tackle the realities of today's workplace. They recognize that effective leadership needs a variety of expertise and competencies, and recognize the impact of their personal traits on the specif task in hand.
The correct answer is "Federalism recognizes that all levels of government have interrelated roles."
The statement that is true of federalism is "Federalism recognizes that all levels of government have interrelated roles."
During the Constitutional Convention during the summer of 1787, the framers of the Constitution believed in the principle of Federalism that is the system of government where power is divided between a central government and regional governments. The framers of the U.S. Constitution granted some faculties to the national government and granted others to the states.
The framers respected the states because they were already functioning one way or the other the people of that time were font to their states.
In United States politics, the principle of federalism refers to that the power of the government is shared by the state governments and the federal government.
The inner solar system has a rocky terrain.
Answer:
- Higher Order Thinking.
Explanation:
'Higher Order Thinking' is described as the thinking process that lays emphasis on learning and memorizing beyond the factual information and recapitulating stories that assist in developing critical and analytical skills.
As per the question, Billie's learning process best exemplifies 'higher-order thinking' as she focuses on learning through 'practice' that enabled her to memorize the information more effectively as she was able to apply the tables successfully to solve the multiplication problem. This reflects that she has moved beyond 'rote' learning and learned the tables critically and analytically which enabled her to use the information constructively for future purposes. Thus, <u>'higher-order thinking'</u> is the correct answer.
Answer:
1. In<u>ductive argument</u>.
2. <u>Inductive argument.</u>
3. <u>Deductve argument.</u>
Explanation:
1. This argument is inductive. The conclusion is a generalization, that is drawn by a premise, the premise has been obtained out of experimentation.
If two grains of sand have diamons, it doesn´t mean the entire beach is made of them. This argument is not strong because the conclusion is not accurate.
2. This is a deductive argument. This type of argument depends on the logic struture of it. If the premise were to be true, the conclusion would be true also.
It is not a sound argument, because thanksgiving happends every fourth thursday of november. It is an invalid argument because the premise is false, there for the concusion is false.
3. This is an invalid deductive argument. The premise is incorrect, so the conclusion that is being deduce from it is also wrong. It is not a sound argument because if you double the length of the sides of a square, the area would quatriple.
