From now until 2025, the structure and policy of the United States government should remain largely the same. For instance, the number of justices on the Supreme Court should remain the same from now to 2025, as it has since 1869. Nine justices work because there are enough to keep each other in check but not too many that the justices are inefficient. (Or at least as inefficient as they would be if more were added.) Filibustering should continue to be allowed. While it is arguably a waste of time, filibustering helps the parties keep each other in check. Gerrymandering should be adjusted if not removed because it takes away the importance of voters in certain districts because they are either so much a majority that they will win either way or so much of a minority that they will lose either way. If gerrymandering was taken away, then the people would have a greater voice in who represents them. Campaign financing is tricky, but I think it may be best if the restrictions were loosened as to who can donate how much but if more transparency was required. There may be political opposition to removing gerrymandering because it allows many politicians to stay in power for a long time without many significant challengers. What we can do, as young citizens, is vote for people who believe in making these changes and petition/lobby for these changes to be made.
Flexor Carpi Radialis is a<span> condition characterized by inflammation of the FCR tendon sheath. In most cases it is assume to be caused by repetitive movement of the muscle in the wrist. this can include things like typing on a keyboard or sewing by hand. </span>
The risk in opening the money market account is that C. Early withdrawal involves a penalty.
<h3>What is a money market?</h3>
It should be noted that a money market simply means an account that's used for dealing with debts of less than a year.
It should be noted that the risk in opening the money market account is that early withdrawal involves a penalty.
Learn more about money market on:
brainly.com/question/25327792
The ancient Roman and Greek civilizations had well-organized political processes that greatly influenced the manner in which later governments were structured in Europe and the United States. The system of political parties, the establishment of divisions in government -- even political words such as democracy, monarchy and tyranny -- originated in ancient Rome and Greece. Although Rome drew many of its political principles from the Greeks, and as a result, developed a government similar to that of Greece, there were several differences between the two.
<u>Higher </u>uncertainty avoidance (e.g., Greece, Portugal, and Uruguay) is associated with a need for structure, avoiding differences, and very formal business conduct governed by many rules, whereas a <u>lower </u>uncertainty avoidance (e.g., Singapore, Jamaica, and Hong Kong) is characterized by an informal business culture, acceptance of risk, and more concern with long term strategy and performance than with daily events.
<u>Explanation</u>:
Uncertainty avoidance refers to the degree of anxiety people feel in uncertain or unfamiliar situations. It ultimately refers to one’s search for Truth.
<u>Higher uncertainty avoidance: </u>It is associated with a need for structure, avoiding differences, and very formal business conduct governed by many rules.
<u>Lower uncertainty avoidance</u>: It is characterized by an informal business culture, acceptance of risk, and more concern with long term strategy and performance than with daily events.
