Answer:
The answer is D. Cohort effect.
Explanation:
A cohort is a group of people that share a characteristic, in social research, such characteristic tends to be the birth year or generational designation; in these cases, cohorts might be strongly influenced by the historical and cultural environment of their generation, and this might have an effect on the results of the research project. Cross-sectional method is subject to these effects because they only apply the research techniques in one specific point in time.
The correct answer is: "The elites use their payoffs to stay in power."
Firms constantly seek to hire as cheap as possible. The less amount they pay in terms of salaries, the greater will be the margin of profits, as the calculation will be profit= revenue - costs, being salaries one fraction of the costs.
This mechanism produces an increase of the inequality gap. Workers get lower salaries and firmowners and directives keep on rising the amount of profits generated by their businesses, and in turn, their payoffs also grow. This trend creates elites.
There is the bully. These people may be bullying the person right in front of them or behind their backs. They are the main abuser.
There is the one who is being bullied. These people are being picked on and abused. They do not fight back, if someone does fight back it's not necessarily bullying. They are the main victim.
There is the assister. These people don't start the bullying but they also bully the victim. They could encourage it or join it.
There are the reinforcements. They don't directly get involved with bullying, but are like an audience. They support the bully and cheer them on.
There are the outsiders. They stay away from the situation and do not defend the victim or support the bully.
There are the defenders. They come to the victim's defense and speak up for them, comfort them. They support the one who is being abused.
Research finds that <u>right-wing authoritarians</u> are among the most prejudiced people in our society.
In psychology, the proper-wing authoritarian (RWA) is a personality type that describes any person who's tremendously submissive to their authority figures, acts aggressively in the name of stated authorities, and is conformist in concept and conduct.
The prevalence of this persona kind in a population varies from tradition to tradition, as a person's upbringing and schooling play a robust role in figuring out whether or not any individual develops this form of character.
The proper-wing authoritarian character become defined via Bob Altemeyer as a refinement of the research of Theodor Adorno. Adorno become the first to recommend the existence of an authoritarian personality as part of an try and explain the upward push of fascism and the Holocaust, however his concept fell into disfavor as it became primarily based on Freudian pseudo-technological know-how. Altemeyer nevertheless felt that Adorno become directly to some thing, and so advanced a greater scientifically rigorous concept.
Learn more about psychology here: brainly.com/question/12011520
#SPJ4