<span>Her therapist is demonstrating "unconditional positive regard".
Unconditional positive regard refers to an idea created by the humanistic analyst Carl Rogers, is the essential acknowledgment and support of a man paying little heed to what the individual says or does. Rogers trusted that unrestricted positive respect is fundamental for sound improvement and endeavored to set up it as a remedial part. Through giving unqualified positive respect, humanistic advisors look to enable their customers to acknowledge and assume liability for themselves.
</span>
Answer:
Which answer best explains James Otis' views of the Revolutionary Period? ... Otis felt that representation without taxation was tyranny
Explanation:
The Yongle Emperor's real name was Zhu Di, he as the third emeror in the Ming Dynasty in China. Zhu Di was emperor from around 1402 - 1424, he was the fourth son of the Hongwu emperor, who founded the Ming Dynasty. (im not sure how that works if Hongwu was the second emperor though...) Zhu Di killed and executed his 3 older brothers and uncles when the eldest brother, Zhu Bio, was crowned king, because of this, his nephew became next in line for the crown because the royal advisor decided Zhu Di was not capable of handling the power of the thrown. in 1402 Zhu Di successfully overthrew his nephew and became king. He then overthrew the emperor of najing, therefore becoming emperor of both the Ming Dynasty and the Yongle Dynasty, earning him the name of Yongle, which means "perpetual Happiness".
I hope this helps, please mark brainless, thankyou :)
Answer:
The correct answer to the question: Which professional tenet has the educator violated? Would be: Protecting students from any practice that harms, or has the potential to harm, students.
Explanation:
The reason for this being the answer comes from the very principle placed in the question: Principle II: Responsibility for Professional Competence: C: The professional educator acts in the best interest of all students.
In this scenario, specifically, the educator finds herself with the situation of a student that she has learned places that student in direct danger. He has to walk home every day and go through a portion of town where gang problems are present. Not only that, but she learns that her student has had to face fights with these gang members on several ocassions, which means that her student has faced not only harm, but the danger of becoming involved with gangs. Instead of acting as she should have professionally, which was to seek the best steps to help the student resolve his issue, she decides to only tell him to be careful and never says anything about the case. This completely violates her duty as a teacher to protect her students and ensure that potential harming situations are dealt with appropriately.
