1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
ASHA 777 [7]
2 years ago
15

In a survey of adults in a certain country conducted during a period of economic​ uncertainty, ​% thought that wages paid to wor

kers in industry were too low. The margin of error was percentage points with ​% confidence. For parts​ (a) through​ (d) below, which represent a reasonable interpretation of the survey​ results? For those that are not​ reasonable, explain the flaw.
Mathematics
1 answer:
Ghella [55]2 years ago
3 0

Answer:

Hello your question has some missing parts below is the complete question

In a survey of 2065 adults in a certain country conducted during a period of economic​ uncertainty, 63​% thought that wages paid to workers in industry were too low. The margin of error was 4 percentage points with ​95% confidence. For parts​ (a) through​ (d) below, which represent a reasonable interpretation of the survey​ results? For those that are not​ reasonable, explain the flaw.

part a:(We are 95 % confident 63 % of adults in the country during the period of economic uncertainty felt wages paid to workers in industry were too low.)

part b:  We are 91 % to 99 % confident 63 % of adults in the country during the period of economic uncertainty felt wages paid to workers in industry were too low.

part c:  We are 95 % confident the proportion of adults in the country during the period of economic uncertainty who believed wages paid to workers in industry were too low was between 0.59 and 0.67. Is the interpretation reasonable?

part d: In 95 % of samples of adults in the country during the period of economic uncertainty, the proportion who believed wages paid to workers in industry were too low is between 0.59 and 0.67. Is the interpretation reasonable?

Answer : For part A :

The interpretation is flawed. No interval has been provided about the population proportion.  

part B :

The interpretation is flawed. The interpretation indicates that the level of confidence is varying.  

Part C

The interpretation is reasonable.

Part D

The interpretation is flawed. The interpretation suggests that this interval sets the standard for all the other intervals, which is not true.

Step-by-step explanation:

Given data: Population = 2065 ,

probability = 63% = 0.6,

margin of error = 4% = 0.04

confidence interval (95%) = ( 0.59,0.67 )  

For part A :

The interpretation is flawed. No interval has been provided about the population proportion.  this is because the confidence interval is not mentioned

part B :

The interpretation is flawed. The interpretation indicates that the level of confidence is varying.  this is because the confidence interval is a fixed value

Part C

The interpretation is reasonable.

this is because the confident level given is fixed

Part D

The interpretation is flawed. The interpretation suggests that this interval sets the standard for all the other intervals, which is not true.

You might be interested in
Dylan Rieder is a statistics student investigating whether athletes have better balance than non-athletes for a thesis project.
Kobotan [32]

Answer:

t=\frac{(3.7-4.1)-0}{\sqrt{\frac{1.1^2}{32}+\frac{1.3^2}{45}}}}=-1.457

p_v =P(t_{75}  

Comparing the p value with a significance level for example \alpha=0.01 we see that p_v>\alpha so we can conclude that we have enough evidence to FAIL to reject the null hypothesis, and we can't say that the population mean for the athletes is significantly lower than the population mean for non athletes.  

Step-by-step explanation:

Data given and notation

\bar X_{A}=3.7 represent the mean for athletes  

\bar X_{NA}=4.1 represent the mean for non athletes  

s_{A}=1.1 represent the sample standard deviation for athletes  

s_{NA}=1.3 represent the sample standard deviation for non athletes

n_{A}=32 sample size for the group 2  

n_{NA}=45 sample size for the group 2  

\alpha=0.01 Significance level provided  

t would represent the statistic (variable of interest)  

Concepts and formulas to use  

We need to conduct a hypothesis in order to check if the population mean for athletes is lower than the population mean for non athletes, the system of  hypothesis would be:  

Null hypothesis:\mu_{A}-\mu_{NA}\geq 0  

Alternative hypothesis:\mu_{A} - \mu_{NA}< 0  

We don't have the population standard deviation's, we can apply a t test to compare means, and the statistic is given by:  

t=\frac{(\bar X_{A}-\bar X_{NA})-\Delta}{\sqrt{\frac{s^2_{A}}{n_{A}}+\frac{s^2_{NA}}{n_{NA}}}} (1)  

t-test: Is used to compare group means. Is one of the most common tests and is used to determine whether the means of two groups are equal to each other.  

With the info given we can replace in formula (1) like this:  

t=\frac{(3.7-4.1)-0}{\sqrt{\frac{1.1^2}{32}+\frac{1.3^2}{45}}}}=-1.457

P value  

We need to find first the degrees of freedom given by:

df=n_A +n_{NA}-2=32+45-2=75

Since is a one left tailed test the p value would be:  

p_v =P(t_{75}  

Comparing the p value with a significance level for example \alpha=0.01 we see that p_v>\alpha so we can conclude that we have enough evidence to FAIL to reject the null hypothesis, and we can't say that the population mean for the athletes is significantly lower than the population mean for non athletes.  

5 0
3 years ago
8x(40+7)=(8x )+(8x7 what is the missing number
Hitman42 [59]
Well since the first expression says 8x(40+7) the answer would be 40 that is missing

Since your splitting 47 into 40 and 7 and multiplying both of them by 8 the answer would be 40
6 0
3 years ago
What is the value of x in the inequality
GalinKa [24]

<u>Answer & Step-by-step explanation:</u>

<u>Question 18 </u>

Isolate the variable by dividing each side by factors that don't contain the variable.

Inequality Form: x ≤ −10

Interval Notation: (−∞ , −10]

<u>Question 19</u>

Isolate the variable by dividing each side by factors that don't contain the variable.

Inequality Form: x ≤ 4

Interval Notation: (−∞ , 4]

8 0
3 years ago
Which choices are equivalent to the exponential expression below? Check all that apply . (4/5) ^ 3 B. 64/125 (4/5)(4/5) + (4/5)
Dmitrij [34]

Answer:

B) 64/125

Step-by-step explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Susan wants to make pumpkin bread and coffee cakes for the school bake sale. She has 15 eggs and 16 cups of flour in her pantry.
Lelu [443]
The function for the problem is p=5x +4y
6 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • The resultant of two forces acting at a point at right angles to each other is 32 pounds. If the horizontal force is 19 pounds,
    8·2 answers
  • Andy wants to buy 20 candy bars. If there is a special sale for buy 2 candy bars get one free. How much will it cost to buy 20 b
    10·2 answers
  • The width of a rectangle is 3x+5 and the length of the rectangle is 6x+10. Determine the ratio of the width to the perimeter.
    13·1 answer
  • What is 1/100 as a percent?
    6·1 answer
  • Determine the direction that is parábola opens: y=4x^2+8x+2
    10·1 answer
  • The temperature at 10 A.M is 12 degrees Fahrenheit. The temperature at 6:00 A.M. was -7 degrees Fahrenheit. How many degrees did
    15·2 answers
  • Aviah uses the treadmill at Biff's Gym. She sets the speed to a constant 4 miles per hour.
    13·1 answer
  • You rent an apartment that costs $1800 per month during the first year, but the rent
    8·1 answer
  • PLEASE HELP ME
    7·1 answer
  • The sum of two numbers is 64. The difference between the numbers is 14. Write a system
    13·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!