What do you think would have happened if Otto Esche’s ideas to use Bactrian Camels to transport salt would have worked out?

1 answer:

6 0

If Otto Esche’s idea to use Bactrian Camels to transport salt would have worked out, there would have been a mad rush to the British Columbia, Canada area. The economy for the province would have more than likely boomed, creating a wealthy area. Salt was a very expensive, yet useful commodity as it was used to preserve meats and cure leather. This made it invaluable during this time period. It could also help to sustain soldiers during war (circa Civil War).

You might be interested in

In 1852 a famous Argentine philosopher named Juan Bautista Alberdi said, "To govern is to populate." What do you think he meant

inysia [295]

The quote to govern is to populate means that in order to have an effective government, you need to have the right persons with you.

This quote tells the reader how Mexico wanted to populate the area but in order to do so they needed the right people.

The right people here would mean the people that are Anglos and Catholic. To them these were the right people that would make them not to repeat the mistakes of the Spanish.

Although you didn't include the picture, one of the reasons why Spanish Texas almost failed was because of hostile native Americans that lived there. These would be the wrong people that Alberdi was trying to make reference to.

4 0

2 years ago

Why was George Washington chosen to lead the continental army

Masja [62]

George Washington was chosen to lead the continental army because of his experience and reputation.<span />

7 0

3 years ago

Look at the map of Europe after World War II. How did Poland change after the war? It lost some of its western land to Germany.

garri49 [273]

Answer:

It became under the influence of communism.

Explanation:

3 0

3 years ago

Plz help I will report if you give me nonsense answers and this is just a warning

Lelu [443]

I think its A. I'm not entirely sure but it does seem most logical.

<u>Anyways a big reason that these powers are limited is to keep society in a stable place. Tyranny brought onto any civilization over the years has led to its downfall. This balance helps keep both the government and its people under equal terms. </u>

Its not B. because this would allow tyrant rulers to keep their position putting everyone else at a disadvantage to please themselves. This simply doesn't make sense if you were to limit the government.

C. isn't a possibility either because each government only governs over said region.

D. can also be justified under my response to B. since it has the same meaning yet is worded differently/ or relates to more modern leaders I suppose.

Anyways, I hope I was helpful and good luck :D

5 0

3 years ago

Which India has improved its development?

Lelechka [254]

Answer:

There are a lot of ways in which India has not improved it's development. One of which is the Poverty and disease persisted in the Indian Society. There is still poverty prevailing in the most parts of India.

The government still needs to implement the policies in a better way to fight such problems. Therefore, India has not improved it's development in this sector but on the other hand India has improved it's development in technology and increased GDP.

6 0

3 years ago