Answer:
should be the "House of Commons"
Answer:
I believe the answer is C but u might want to recheck
Explanation:
Answer:
Explanation:
Open-source innovation has not revolutionized and software and biotech industries. It completely changes the way that we think about creativity. To do something new we don't have to do something new we an existing or emerging form, made available through access and do something new with them. This promotes democracy in the innovation game, with open source services against persons or groups or against field or endeavors. The new open-source landscape is a vastly fertile one, with countless possibilities for growth, but its vastness and freedom can also overwhelming.
<u>Here are three key shifts:
</u>
- Passive recipients to active co-creator
- Our culture and our system for customers and emerging opportunities
- Own and protect to share and expand
Answer:
c. both highly multiracial and paid higher wages than workers in the East.
Explanation:
Throughout the nineteenth century many regions of the world reached levels of technological advance never before experienced by human societies. Although such development has not been equitable in all nations, we can say that the planet as a whole has been hit by this process. In other words, we find that the progress made possible by the Industrial Revolution has reached, to a greater or lesser extent, almost all men. Although the western working class present in the nineteenth century had poor quality of life and wages, this class had much higher wages than the eastern working class, which caused many easterners to migrate to the west looking for a better quality of life, the result of which was that in the nineteenth century the western working class became much more multiracial than the eastern working class.
