Answer:
General Deterrence
Explanation:
Deterrence is of two types including:
1. General deterrence.
2. Specific deterrence.
General deterrence: The term general deterrence is defined as the process that is being designed to stop or prevent various crimes in a general population. In this scenario, this creates is a huge impact on people related to the legal punishment threat because the person involved in any illegal thing shall be punished in public in a way to humiliate the person. Hence, the other person who sees this will be scared of doing similar crimes.
In the question above, the statement signifies the "general deterrence".
Answer:
The Qing Dynasty
Explanation:
The Qing Dynasty was the last imperial dynasty to rule China.
Hope this helps!
Rule of force-No rules and people simply take what they want
First come-first served-When shoppers arrive when the store opens so they can buy all the goods on a sale at low prices
Gov't rules-the gov't decides who receives what and when
Markets- compete for more customer and higher profit,workers to compete for better jobs and larger incomes.
Answer:
Yes, it does contain an argument.
Explanation:
In the begining of the passage it states: "Our theories and hypotheses regarding space and time have changed dramatically in the last few centuries." this statement is argumented in the next sentence because is giving the reader valid examples of what the he (the writer) stated, he's showing how the theories and hypotheses have changed when he says we once thought the sun and other plantes circle around Earth and how we now know is not that way, so it does contain an argument.
Answer:
What you need to know about an unfamiliar discipline in order to draw upon its insights and critically analyze them
Explanation:
Possessing disciplinary adequacy means sufficient and ample comprehension of a discipline enough to grasp it edges, boundaries and how it can be critically analyzed. It means understanding how the discipline views the world such as in terms of its theories, assumptions, methods, concepts or perspectives. In other words to have disciplinary adequacy only requires that one understand a discipline enough to know its cognitive map in terms of how it approaches and views the problem/subject