Answer:
The statement is true, as it is an example of foreign direct investment.
Explanation:
Foreign direct investment is the direct investment by individuals or legal persons in production or business operations abroad. In this context, investments include both acquisition of foreign operations and expansion of own operations.
Foreign direct investment does not include the purchase of either shares or bonds per se. More specifically, the IMF has restricted direct investment on acquisitions to cases where the foreign investor owns 10% or more of the shares that give administrative rights in the business. Investment funds that can be classified as foreign direct investments therefore include equity deposits, reinvestments of dividends from the business, as well as the allocation of short-term and long-term loans between parent companies and subsidiaries.
Answer:
The answer and procedures of the exercise are attached in the following archives.
Explanation:
Consider this explanation too
The IRR is the project’s expected rate of return, assuming that intermediate cash flows also earn the IRR. If this return exceeds the cost of the capital invested in the project, the excess value goes to the firm’s shareholders. Therefore, independent projects whose IRR is greater than the WACC should be accepted.
Therefore in this case WACC of the project is 7% and IRR of the project is 1.86% which is less than WACC of the project. Hence the firm reject the project delta.
Calculation of IRR is based on Cash inflows and outflows for the number of years so that increase in cost of capital will not affect IRR.
Answer:
The cost basis for the land is equal under both options.
Explanation:
If Taylor pays Ella $150,000 in cash and assumes the mortgage of $100,000, the cost basis of the land will be $250,000 (= $150,000 + $100,000). If he decides to pay Ella the full amount of $250,000, that will also be the cost basis of the land.
The only real difference is that if Taylor decides to assume the mortgage, he will need a smaller initial cash flow ($150,000).
Answer:
The purposes of the Act and King 111 are, inter alia, to promote compliance with the Bill of Rights as provided for in the Constitution in the application of company law, to encourage transparency and high standards of corporate governance and provide for the balancing of rights and obligations of shareholders
