Answer:
a higher price and produce a smaller output than a competitive firm
Explanation:
A monpolistically competitive firm is a firm that :
1. Sells differentiated products from other firms in the industry.
2. Has many buyers and sellers
3. Is a price maker
4. Has no barrier to entry or exist of firms
An example of a monpolistically competitive firm is a resturant.
A competitive firm is a firm that:
1. Sells identical goods with other firms in the industry.
2. Is a price taker . Prices are set by forces of demand and supply
3. Has many buyers and sellers
4. There are no barriers to entry or exist of firms.
When a monopolistic and competition firm are faced with the same unit cost, a monopolistic firm would aim to earn profit by increasing its price and reducing the quantity produced.
While a perfect competition would sell at the price set by the forces of demand and supply. The firm can increase the quantity produced in order to increase revenue.
A monopolistic firm is able to charge a higher price for its products while a perfect competition isn't.
Answer:
Adjusted Balance 31,671
Explanation:
<em>CASH </em>
Balance 25,497
Service Charge -11
Collection in firm behalf 7,000
NSF -805
accounting mistake -10
Adjusted Balance 31,671
<em>BANK </em>
Balance 26,808
Outstanding Check -3,269
Deposit in transit 8,132
Adjusted Balance 31,671
The goal of the reconciliation is to make up for the unknow information for each party. The bank and the firm We are goin to make jounral entries for all the infoamrition which is unknow to the firm until the bank statement is received.
Answer:
B
Explanation:
Coase theorem states that in a situation of conflicting property right . the trading parties should be able to arrive at a mutually benefiting term that should cover the the cost and other underlying value of the property involved.
In the scenario above , for Billy McGee to retain the domain name as the WIPO has already given the right to Iron maiden , he will have to pay iron maiden more than the value to iron maiden and less than the value to him so that the two can mutually benefit from the transaction
Answer:
c. 2.36 years
Explanation:
In the payback, we analyze in how many years the invested amount is recovered. The computation is shown below:
In year 0 = $750
In year 1 = $300
In year 2 = $325
In year 3 = $350
If we sum the first 2 year cash inflows than it would be $625
Now we deduct the $625 from the $750 , so the amount would be $125 as if we added the fourth year cash inflow so the total amount exceed to the initial investment. So, we deduct it
And, the next year cash inflow is $350
So, the payback period equal to
= 2 years + ($125 ÷ $350)
= 2.36 years
In 2.36 yeas, the invested amount is recovered.
Answer:
B) requires that dividends not paid in any year must be made up in a later year before dividends are distributed to common shareholders.
Explanation:
In cumulative feature of preferred stock, the preference shareholders have priority of shareholders over common shareholders in the year subsequent to the year in which the dividend is not distributed. All other options given in the question are incorrect.
