A balance between individual rights and social control is possible through a set of democratic and participatory laws.
<h3>What are individual rights?</h3>
Individual rights is a term that refers to the freedoms and rights that an individual has from the moment he is born. Among these rights are the right to move freely, the right to think and express oneself freely, among others.
<h3>What is control and authority?</h3>
Control and authority are terms that refer to the control that the state has over individuals so that society is in harmony and the lives of citizens are not disturbed.
In accordance with the above, it can be inferred that it is possible that there is a balance between these two concepts. In fact, in most democratic states today, individual rights allow the control and legitimate authority of the state.
Learn more about individual rights in: brainly.com/question/619133
#SPJ1
One major goal of the US Economic Foreign Policy was to create trade agreements! :)
Although a description of the case was not provided for this question, we can confirm that as a member of the jury, when deciding guilt, you should hold the prosecution to the burden of proof.
<h3>What we know about the burden of proof.</h3>
- In any criminal case, the prosecution carries the burden of proof.
- The prosecution must prove the guilt of the defendant beyond a reasonable doubt.
- When acting as a member of the jury, you should hold your decision to this standard.
- You should only vote guilty if there are no logical doubts present as to the arguments presented by the prosecution.
Therefore, we can confirm that when acting as a jury member, you should base your decision on the prosecution's ability to prove guilt beyond any reasonable doubt.
To learn more about criminal law visit:
brainly.com/question/1869780?referrer=searchResults
