Answer:
B
Explanation:
A: enrolling in different type of school is not very relevant to politics
C: When she decides not to vote "does not make a difference", she didn't participate.
D: moving into other places is not very relevant to politics
Many countries around the world took different decisions during wartime. Some have been more brutal and difficult than we could have imagined. But in this situation that the Armenians faced, political events also had an effect. If you really want to get the right answer, you have to turn your perspective to both sides. Because both sides see themselves as justified in this event in history. And indeed, both sides have their faults and their justifications. In 1919, two American diplomats who wanted to investigate the event impartially visited the region. Their names were Emory Niles and Arthur Sutherland, and their view of the region was that both sides were right. Among the statements they wrote, it was written that the Armenians formed gangs against the Turks and plundered the Turkish villages in the region. But they also wrote that "Turkish soldiers were displaying a bad attitude towards Armenian civilians. According to the Turks, the reason for this was that the Armenians caused unrest in the region and took part in gang actions against the Turks. So the soldiers had to take control of the area. But when we look further into the past, we see that Armenians and Turks lived in peace in the empire. Even Armenian representatives took part in the Ottoman parliament in the 19th century. The reason why 2 communities that lived in harmony are so angry with each other is that foreign countries provoke the region to annex the region. We know that in the first world war, Russia wanted to invade the region. We also know that the Russians want to include the Orthodox Armenians in the region among themselves. It would not be difficult to conclude that the Russians formed gangs from the Armenians in the region and provoked them against the Kurdish and Turkish villages in the region. If this is indeed true, we would conclude that both parties are right in their own way.
Answer: Industry advanced onward and drew millions of workers into the new cities. urban population increased seven fold in the half-century after the Civil War. Much of America's urban growth came from the millions of immigrants pouring into the... by a number of causes, what historians typically call “push” and “pull” factors.
Explanation:
I DON'T KNOW IF I GOT THIS RIGHT SO DON'T BE RUDE.... and i'm sorry if u got this wrong
The Wilmot Proviso, one of the major events leading to the American Civil War, it would have banned slavery in any territory to be acquired from Mexico in the Mexican War or in the future, including the area later known as the Mexican Cession, but which some proponents construed to also include the disputed lands in south Texas and New Mexico east of the Rio Grande.
<span>This was controversial between the Southern and Northern states, because this allowed the Union to always have more representatives in the House of Representatives and would make sure that the Union could control the Southern states and vote against anything will slavery. </span>
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although there are no options attached we can say the following.
On April 25, 1836, General Sam Houston, commander-in-chief of the Texan Army, wrote his official report about the Battle of San Jacinto, close to Houston, Texas.
The report was addressed to D.G. Burnett, President of the Republic of Texas.
According to the report, 630 Mexican soldiers died in the battle, 208 were wounded and 730 captured.
This official Houston report can be found in the Archives of the State Library in Austin, Texas.
On April 21, 1836, the Texan troops led by General Sam Houston defeated the Mexican troops led by General Antonio López de Santana.
