Detroit, because it had racial inequality.
It led to it because it allowed for a bicameral structure with proportional representation based on the number of citizens in a state. If it hadn't been for it, there would probably only have been the senate which would be bad because it would mean that huge colonies would have just as many senators as the small colonies which would be bad for those people.
For FDR, this statement actually does not really apply, in the sense that he both obtained landslide victories and great legislative success, despite harsh opposition in Congress. For Lyndon Johnson, this was also somewhat the case, since he was able to usher in controversial legislation.
C is the correct answer.
A strict constructionist would interpret the Constitution using only the words as written in the text without considerations for legislative history and the like.
"Protestants and Catholics" were the two monarchies among the choices given in the question between whom the <span>Puritan Revolution was a conflict. The correct option among all the options that are given in the question is the third option or option "C". I hope that the answer has come to your help.</span>
