The correct answer I believe is D
<span>The
experience of the new immigrants was different. By 1890, no more free
land was available, so newcomers found jobs in city factories. They
lived in crowded neighborhoods, where everyone shared a common language
and culture.
Hope this helped :)
</span>
Answers & Explanation:
(A) The image shows the idea of the colonization period (after the treaty made at the end of the Spanish-American war around 1898) known as "White man's burden" that places the American white man on a mission to "civilize" people of nations foreign countries, in a compulsory and oppressive way, in a show of sovereignty. This "civilizing" strategy is shown in the image with the teacher representing "Uncle Sam" and the children representing Caribbean countries assigned from the Spain to the U.S.
(B) Another period to be portrayed in the image is the one known as the "gilded age" (At the end of the 19th century, from the 1870s until about 1900) which representing great economic, political and military growth in the US compared to other countries. With colonialism in full swing, American imperialism thrived mainly on the oppression of native peoples, with the intention of bringing "civilization" to them. Differences in this strategy and the way the white American man saw each of these people at that time can be seen in the image, such as the African American boy cleaning the classroom windows, the indigenous boy reading a book upside down and a Chinese boy wanting to enter the class but that is visibly excluded.
(C) Some of the negative impacts associated with the colonization of Native American and African peoples, among others include degradation of the natural resources of these countries, urbanization, the introduction of strange diseases from Europe, in addition to changes in social and economic systems. Furthermore, even after centuries of the possible end of slavery, the marginalization of African peoples and their descendants, as well as indigenous peoples, Latin-americans, and lower class populations.
Explanation:
bitter dissapointment over failure to win territory
-rising inflations in unemployment
-democraric government seemed hopeless
Answer:
The Quarantine Speech was given by U.S. President Franklin D. Roosevelt on October 5, 1937 in Chicago (on the occasion of the dedication of the bridge between north and south outer Lake Shore Drive), calling for an international "quarantine" against the "epidemic of world lawlessness" by aggressive nations as an alternative to the political climate of American neutrality and non-intervention that was prevalent at the time. The speech intensified America's isolationist mood, causing protest by non-interventionists and foes to intervene. No countries were directly mentioned in the speech, although it was interpreted as referring to the Empire of Japan, the Kingdom of Italy, and Nazi Germany.[1] Roosevelt suggested the use of economic pressure, a forceful response, but less direct than outright aggression.
Public response to the speech was mixed. Famed cartoonist Percy Crosby, creator of Skippy (comic strip) and very outspoken Roosevelt critic, bought a two-page advertisement in the New York Sun to attack it.[2] In addition, it was heavily criticized by Hearst-owned newspapers and Robert R. McCormick of the Chicago Tribune, but several subsequent compendia of editorials showed overall approval in US media.[3] Roosevelt realized the impact that those witting in favor of isolationism had on the nation. He hoped that the storm isolationists' created would fade away and allow the general public to become educated and even active in international policy. [4] However, this was not the response that grew over time, in fact, it ended up intensifying isolationism views in more Americans.[5] Roosevelt even mentioned in two personal letters written on October 16, 1937, that "he was 'fighting against a public psychology which comes very close to saying 'peace at any price.'"'[6] Disappointed in how the public reacted to the speech, Roosevelt decided to take a step back with regards to his foreign policy. Even to the point of accepting an apology from Japan after the sinking of the USS Panay
Explanation:
