The right answer would be B) Damages from natural disasters.
Have a nice day! <3
Salamanca, Porto, sevilla
Answer:
If prithviraj had killed ghori in the first battle, there would be no need for a second battle where prithviraj would be defeated.
Explanation:
Although Prithviraj emerged victorious in the first battle, he proved to be an extremely arrogant and superb character, allowing Ghori to stay alive, even though he knew it could have dire consequences. This decision by Prithviraj was senseless and caused the need for a second battle where he was defeated, also because of his arrogance, allowing Ghori to continue his plans.
Answer:
Answer is Option B: Did you hear how well Goodman answered that question on job creation?
Explanation:
Since Donovan was sure that he would cote for Goodman, he would be supporting his thoughts. In order to support his thought, he would encourage the statements made by Goodman in the debate.
So, he would start his response with the statement praising Goodman that he spoke very well on job creation, Option B. He would not criticize Goodman's statement by calling it vague as per Option C. Nor would he appreciate Hernandez saying he would make a tight race as per Option D.
Is this a question or statement? Because I know a lot of people who are religious and eat meat...
