Term used for a situation in which paired-choice voting by majority rule fails to produce a consistent ranking of society's preferences for public goods is the paradox of voting.
The paradox of voting, also known as Downs' paradox, states that the costs of voting usually outweigh the expected benefits for a rational, self-interested voter. Because the likelihood of exercising the pivotal vote is negligible in comparison to any reasonable estimate of the private individual benefits of the various possible outcomes, the expected benefits of voting outweigh the costs.
Responses to the paradox of voting have included the belief that voters vote to express their preference for a candidate rather than to influence the outcome of the election, that voters exercise some altruism, or that the paradox ignores the collateral benefits associated with voting that are not related to the resulting electoral outcome.
Learn more about paradox of voting here:
brainly.com/question/17136492
#SPJ4
<span><span>1.1Robert Byrd</span><span>1.2Hugo Black</span><span>1.3Theodore G. Bilbo</span><span>1.4Edward L. Jackson</span><span>1.5Rice W. Means</span><span>1.6Clarence Morley</span><span>1.7Bibb Graves</span><span>1.8Clifford Walker</span><span>1.9George Gordon</span><span>1.10John Brown Gordon</span><span>1.11John Clinton Porter</span><span>1.12David Duke</span><span>1.13<span>Benjamin F. Stapleton -Wikipedia </span></span></span>
Answer:
The United States believed that Iraq possessed weapons of mass destruction which posed a great threat at the hands of the dictatorial leader Saddam Hussein. It also believed that terrorists were supported and even harbored by the country. So, to remove the dictator from power and to get rid of any weapons and eliminate or drive out terrorists were the main objectives behind the attack on Iraq.
Explanation:
The rationale behind the motive to invade and attack Iraq was to primarily <u>end the regime of the dictatorial leader Saddam Hussein</u>. Other purposes were to <u>end the harboring of terrorists in the land</u> and <u>eliminate any weapons of mass destruction that Iraq was believed to be in possession of</u>.
The attack on Iraq by the United States in 2003 was based on US's beliefs that the Arab nation has disobeyed the demands of the United Nations and had harbored and supported terrorists. Moreover, the need to eliminate the dictator Saddam Hussein and establish a democratic government and provide peace to the Iraq people also became the main objective behind the invasion. The US also believed that Iraq possessed weapons of mass destruction which can act as a huge threat to the overall safety of everyone around the world. So, the need to identify, isolate and destroy such weapons before they are actually put into use also led to the attack. US military continued to stay in Iraq till 2011 after which all troops were withdrawn.
Answer:
wagwan (Jamaican, MLE) Greeting equivalent to what's up or what's happening. Usage notes. It is used through out the Jamaican diaspora, including in hip-hop culture and by reggae music fans. The standard response is nagwan / nuttin nah gwaan (“ nothing is going on ”).
hope that helps
