Answer:
The correct answer is predictive validity test.
Explanation:
A predictive validity test is carried out in order to predict the performance that a collaborator will have in the future. With this dynamic, it is ensured that an honest employee is hired, and that he always acts under the rules of the organization to which he will belong. In general, there are discrepancies compared to what many people can do under certain circumstances, and this test is precisely what they want to know about the performance under different scenarios.
Answer:
No, there is no contract between the two parties because of withdrawal of offer (Revocation) before the acceptance of the other party.
Explanation:
When one party offers another party and after some time the offer maker withdraws the offer by communicating that they had revoked then the offer is no more available to the other party and is often termed as Revocation. So when the offer maker revokes before the acceptance of the offer by the other party then their is no offer at consideration to the other party, which means if there is no offer then their can not be an acceptance of an offer and of course when there is no acceptance then there is no contract.
The communication of revocation was held before the acceptance of the offer of the other party which agains says that the contract was not actually formed.
Answer:
The interest rate on a 10-year corporate bond for a company with AA rating will be higher than for a 10-year bond for a company with a BBB- rating.
True
Answer:
E. $40,600
Explanation:
Calculation for the amount of net income reported on Sparty's income statement
Revenue $97,000
Less: Operating Expenses $39,000
Profit Before Tax $58,000
(97,000-39,000)
Less Taxes $17,400
Net Income $40,600
($58,000-$17,400)
Therefore the amount of net income reported on Sparty's income statement will be $40,600
Answer:
Either you quit trying and lose $800 sunk, or you spend $800 for $1,600 total in which the Net from the sale of $1,000 would results in a loss of $600. That means it will be of good to lose $600 than $800.
Explanation:
Since $800 has been spent which means Spending up to an additional $1,000 is still reasonable, but a condition in which you know that the deal will definitely go through.
Secondly since you have already sunk $800, and you know that spending an additional $800 would guarantee it, you can do one among this two options which are either you stop trying and lose the $800 sunk, or you the spend $800 for $1,600($1,000+$600) total in which the Net from the sale of $1,000 would results in a loss of $600($1,000-$800=200,$800-$200=$600). That means it will be of good to lose $600 than $800.
