Answer:
Government authorities :
They will use the financing statement to ensure the fairness of the business and to receive proper amount of tax.
Investors :
Current or potential investors would check financial statements to ensure they will suitable returns after investment.
Creditors :
They will check financial statements to make sure they get their due money back.
Employees :
The employees will ask for bonus if the company performance in statements is good,
Answer:
if foreign investment fell by 100% it would be totally eliminated, so it not possible for it to fall by more than 100%
Explanation:
Since in the question it is given that reduction of the western investment for the third world countries consist that foreign investment falls by 350% for the year 1990s
So if we go through the options, the wrong statement is the last one as it shows that the foreign investment fall by 100% i.e to be fully eliminated
Hence the other options are wrong
Answer:
The NPV of this investment is $64,581.75
Explanation:
Hi, we need to discount to present value all the future cash flows, the formula to use is as follows:
Where
NPV = Net Present Value
CF = The cash flow stated in the problem by year
r= discount rate (in our case, 0.08 or 8%)
Now, let´s solve this.
So, the net present value of this project is $64,581.75
Best of luck.
Answer:
The answer is NO.
Explanation:
The answer is NO since the tax cut does not equate or rather would not be an effective stimulus due to the fact that debt reduction would not stimulate or increase consumption.
To properly understand the narrative of the question and the answer herein, let us define what effective stimulus is.
Effective stimulus or as preferably known as An economic stimulus is the utilization of funds or design of that helps agitate growth during downtime or recession in a country. The decision makers of a country mostly utilize the tactics of giving rebates and increasing government expenses to name a few.
Now relating it back to the question, since the intention of the rebate is to ease payment on tax does not equate to increase in consumption, the answer is a NO.
Answer:
Survival of the fittest
Explanation:
Survival of the fittest, term made famous in the fifth edition (published in 1869) of On the Origin of Species by British naturalist Charles Darwin, which suggested that organisms best adjusted to their environment are the most successful in surviving and reproducing. Darwin borrowed the term from English sociologist and philosopher Herbert Spencer, who first used it in his 1864 book Principles of Biology. (Spencer came up with the phrase only after reading Darwin’s work.)
