1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Dmitry [639]
3 years ago
10

Round 785 to 3 significant figures.

Mathematics
1 answer:
Lapatulllka [165]3 years ago
5 0
800 because it's the 100th number you calculate
You might be interested in
Nicki was told to find three consecutive odd integers whose rum is 53. What is the right equation?
Lyrx [107]

The option D) x + x+2 + x+4 = 53 represents the exact equation of sum of three consecutive odd integers which is equal to 53.

<u>Step-by-step explanation:</u>

The sum of the three consecutive odd integers = 53

<u>To frame the equation :</u>

  • Let us consider any of the three consecutive odd integers.
  • Let us take 1,3,5 as the three consecutive odd integers.

Assume the first odd integer as 'x'. In this case, (x=1)

  • The second consecutive odd integer is 3.
  • The difference between 1 and 3 is 2.

Therefore, the second consecutive odd integer is x+2.

  • The third consecutive odd integer is 5.
  • The difference between 1 and 5 is 4.

Therefore, the third consecutive odd integer is x+4.

This means that, the sum of any three consecutive odd integers are given as x + x+2 + x+4.

Given that,

Sum of the three consecutive odd integers is 53.

The first odd integer + second odd integer + third odd integer = 53

x + x+2 + x+4 = 53.

The option D) x + x+2 + x+4 = 53 represents the exact equation of sum of three consecutive odd integers which is equal to 53.

6 0
3 years ago
Question 4 plz show ALL STEPS
scoray [572]

Part (a)

Locate x = -1 on the x axis. Draw a vertical line through this x value until you reach the f(x) curve. Then move horizontally until you reach the y axis. You should arrive at y = 4. Check out the diagram below to see what I mean.

Since f(-1) = 4, this means we can then say

g( f(-1) ) = g( 4 ) = 4

To evaluate g(4), we'll follow the same idea as what we did with f(x). However, we'll start at x = 4 and draw a vertical line until we reach the g(x) curve this time.

<h3>Answer:  4</h3>

==========================================================

Part (b)

We use the same idea as part (a)

f(-2) = 5

g( f(-2) ) = g(5) = 6

<h3>Answer:  6</h3>

==========================================================

Part (c)

Same idea as the last two parts. We start on the inside and work toward the outside. Keep in mind that g(x) is now the inner function for this part and for part (d) as well.

g(1) = -2

f( g(1) ) = f(-2) = 5

<h3>Answer:   5</h3>

==========================================================

Part (d)

Same idea as part (c)

g(2) = 0

f( g(2) ) = f( 0 ) = 3

<h3>Answer:  3</h3>

6 0
3 years ago
For the rational function f(x)= 5x3-x/2x3 , identify any removable discontinuities.
Ierofanga [76]

Answer:

Earlier this month, news broke of progress on this 82-year-old question, thanks to prolific mathematician Terence Tao. And while the story of Tao’s breakthrough is good news, the problem isn’t fully solved.

A refresher on the Collatz Conjecture: It’s all about that function f(n), shown above, which takes even numbers and cuts them in half, while odd numbers get tripled and then added to 1. Take any natural number, apply f, then apply f again and again. You eventually land on 1, for every number we’ve ever checked. The Conjecture is that this is true for all natural numbers.

Tao’s recent work is a near-solution to the Collatz Conjecture in some subtle ways. But his methods most likely can’t be adapted to yield a complete solution to the problem, as he subsequently explained. So we might be working on it for decades longer.

The Conjecture is in the math discipline known as Dynamical Systems, or the study of situations that change over time in semi-predictable ways. It looks like a simple, innocuous question, but that’s what makes it special. Why is such a basic question so hard to answer? It serves as a benchmark for our understanding; once we solve it, then we can proceed to much more complicated matters.

The study of dynamical systems could become more robust than anyone today could imagine. But we’ll need to solve the Collatz Conjecture for the subject to flourish.

Step-by-step explanation:

Earlier this month, news broke of progress on this 82-year-old question, thanks to prolific mathematician Terence Tao. And while the story of Tao’s breakthrough is good news, the problem isn’t fully solved.

A refresher on the Collatz Conjecture: It’s all about that function f(n), shown above, which takes even numbers and cuts them in half, while odd numbers get tripled and then added to 1. Take any natural number, apply f, then apply f again and again. You eventually land on 1, for every number we’ve ever checked. The Conjecture is that this is true for all natural numbers.

Tao’s recent work is a near-solution to the Collatz Conjecture in some subtle ways. But his methods most likely can’t be adapted to yield a complete solution to the problem, as he subsequently explained. So we might be working on it for decades longer.

The Conjecture is in the math discipline known as Dynamical Systems, or the study of situations that change over time in semi-predictable ways. It looks like a simple, innocuous question, but that’s what makes it special. Why is such a basic question so hard to answer? It serves as a benchmark for our understanding; once we solve it, then we can proceed to much more complicated matters.

The study of dynamical systems could become more robust than anyone today could imagine. But we’ll need to solve the Collatz Conjecture for the subject to flourish.Earlier this month, news broke of progress on this 82-year-old question, thanks to prolific mathematician Terence Tao. And while the story of Tao’s breakthrough is good news, the problem isn’t fully solved.

A refresher on the Collatz Conjecture: It’s all about that function f(n), shown above, which takes even numbers and cuts them in half, while odd numbers get tripled and then added to 1. Take any natural number, apply f, then apply f again and again. You eventually land on 1, for every number we’ve ever checked. The Conjecture is that this is true for all natural numbers.

Tao’s recent work is a near-solution to the Collatz Conjecture in some subtle ways. But his methods most likely can’t be adapted to yield a complete solution to the problem, as he subsequently explained. So we might be working on it for decades longer.

The Conjecture is in the math discipline known as Dynamical Systems, or the study of situations that change over time in semi-predictable ways. It looks like a simple, innocuous question, but that’s what makes it special. Why is such a basic question so hard to answer? It serves as a benchmark for our understanding; once we solve it, then we can proceed to much more complicated matters.

The study of dynamical systems could become more robust than anyone today could imagine. But we’ll need to solve the Collatz Conjecture for the subject to flourish.Earlier this month, news broke of progress on this 82-year-old question, thanks to prolific mathematician Terence Tao. And while the story of Tao’s breakthrough is good news, the problem isn’t fully solved.

A refresher on the Collatz Conjecture: It’s all about that function f(n), shown above, which takes even numbers and cuts them in half, while odd numbers get tripled and then added to 1. Take any natural number, apply f, then apply f again and again. You eventually land on 1, for every number we’ve ever checked. The Conjecture is that this is true for all natural numbers.

Tao’s rece

3 0
3 years ago
I am a witch and I'll hex you if you don't know but answer to get the points
Alexeev081 [22]

2+1/3n=8 is the answer, I believe.

4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
PLEASE HELP URGENT WILL MARK BRAINIEST
Kay [80]

Answer

DFE and FED

Step-by-step explanation:

4 0
3 years ago
Other questions:
  • Write the numbers in order from least to greatest 8 1/5, 8.5, 8 4/5, 8.44
    11·2 answers
  • Please help me and hurry
    5·1 answer
  • Give three numbers between 8 and -8
    15·2 answers
  • Carpenters are installing hinges. They have 371 screws. Each hinge needs 3 screws. How many hinges can they install?
    9·1 answer
  • How to find the domain of a function
    14·1 answer
  • Need help will mark brainiest thank you
    13·1 answer
  • sharon has $24 and begins saving $8 each week toward buying new clothes Wes has $36 and begins saving $5 each week is there a we
    14·2 answers
  • Solve for a.<br><br> a+(−1.3)=−4.5
    8·1 answer
  • If a+b=3 and ab=4 find the value of a3+b3
    8·1 answer
  • Find the quotient. If possible, rename the quotient as a mixed number or a whole number. Write your answer in simplest form, usi
    8·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!