<span>They are "utilizing a cross-case method approach
and grounded theory".</span>
Grounded Theory<span> is an inductive strategy. Albeit numerous call
Grounded Theory a subjective strategy, it isn't. It is a general technique. It
is the methodical age of hypothesis from efficient research. It is an
arrangement of thorough research strategies prompting the development of
applied classifications.</span>
1. The idea behind the concept of multiple intelligences is that human intelligence can take different "modalities," as opposed to being dominated by a single general ability. I think this is a valid construct, as it approaches the concept of "intelligence" from various different angles, not always considered when discussing intelligence in other contexts.
2. As we do not have access to this text, we are not able to answer this section of the question.
3. One way in which the developers of a test of multiple intelligences could demonstrate the validity of the test using evidence would be by also researching the behaviour of the people who took the test out in the real world. They could compare these results to the results of the test. In this way, they would be more likely to find out whether the intelligences mentioned in the test are indeed exercised in real life.
4. A passage from the Bible that could support this idea would be the following:
<em>1 Corinthians 12:12-14 – "Just as a body, though one, has many parts, but all its many parts form one body, so it is with Christ. For we were all baptised by one Spirit so as to form one body—whether Jews or Gentiles, slave or free—and we were all given the one Spirit to drink. Even so the body is not made up of one part but of many."</em>
In this passage, the idea of many parts within a single body is presented. However, it is also stated that the many parts of the body in fact end up forming a single entity. This is similar to the multiple intelligences that combine to give a single personality capable of certain things.
Yes it does match up with the layers
<span>Calcite exhibits cleavage in three directions.</span>
Answer: For the colonists to give up their tea was a very important part of this rebellion. Many colonists gave up something important to them, to help move their purpose forward. This was a turning point in the Revolution as a whole because it allowed to realize that rebellion was acceptable.
Explanation: Hope this helped!! :)
