Answer:
Paying attention to what the negative is saying.
Identifying important pieces of evidence that the negative uses.
If I have any thinking about a possible counterclaim
Explanation:
What should you be doing while the negative is presenting a claim and evidence?
Paying attention to what the negative is saying.
Identifying important pieces of evidence that the negative uses.
If I have any thinking about a possible counterclaim
During the course of negative presenting a claim and evidence, it is important to pay attention to what the negative is saying, which will be very handy when preparing the counterclaim to argue against the negative claims.Secondly, during the course of this presentation, one's must identify important pieces of evidence that the negative uses which provide rebuttal evidence to counter it when presenting and lastly,you must be t
hinking about a possible counterclaim in order to rebuttal all the negative claims and evidence.
Answer:
Intergenerational mobility.
Explanation:
Intergenerational mobility refers to the changes in social status between different generations within the same family, this type of mobility permits new generations to have better opportunities than the ones that their ancestors had and change their social status.
In this example Carlos' grandfather was an agricultural worker, Carlos' father worked as a clerk and because of their efforts, Carlos' is now able to graduate from college and medical school. We can see how Carlos' family has gone through changes in social status thanks to the efforts and opportunities they created.
Thus, this is an example of intergenerational mobility.
The definition of cognitive dissonance is "<span>the state of having inconsistent thoughts, beliefs, or attitudes, especially as relating to behavioral decisions and attitude change." hope this helps.</span>
The correct answer is letter D
Net working capital is the aggregate value of all current assets and current liabilities. It is used to measure a company's short-term liquidity and can also be used to get an overall impression of the company's management's ability to use assets efficiently.
Answer? 1) Yes, it is a bit ironic. If a company has an Ethics program that's comprehensive enough, executives should not have to be caught in business criminal activities.
2.) First let's talk about Ethics programs. These are basically programs that embody the business philosophies of a company such that every stakeholder understand how business is run in the company. It basically defines to employees, staff, investors, vendors and customers the rules of Business Ethics as defined by the firm, from the maximum amount of tips to collect from customers to how intimate employees get with clients so that there's no confusion. Now, all this is to clarify but the question here is how effective was the program if criminal activity was discovered? It's simple. The most comprehensive Ethics programs can't control human circumstantial behaviour. As clear as rules may be, they are always still broken. And this is because, with humans, there an infinite number of things to put into consideration, most of which won't always follow rules. One may be 100% compliant with said rules but find themselves weak to give in at some point for any possible reason the person deemed more important than upholding the companies ethics. In other words, these rules are held by the people it binds and the delivery will always be subjective. Whenever it is deemed unfavorable to uphold, it most likely will be dropped.
Therefore, it might have been the most effective and comprehensive Ethics program in the world but only as effective as the executives demmed it subjectively.
