Answer:
D. the demand for Nike running shoes is less elastic than the demand for shoes.
Explanation:
In this the substitutes would be more for the particular brand rather than the normal running shoes. Since the demand of running shoes might be less elastic as compared to the demand of nike running shows because the consumer shifted from the nike to other brand that are popular. Plus, the elasticity of demand for running shoes is considered to be inelastic as there is many subsitutes
So, the option d is correct
Answer:
The correct answer is letter "B": predatory pricing.
Explanation:
Predatory pricing refers to companies setting prices below the average level in an attempt to wipe out competition. In the beginning, consumers may benefit from the low prices but after the competition has disappeared, the predatory company raises the prices, but, in this scenario, consumers do not have substitutes from where to choose. The predatory company became a monopoly.
Predatory pricing practices are forbidden by the Federal Trade Commission (FTC) in the U.S.
Answer:
The answer is: D) Crimson’s dividends received deduction is $21,000
Explanation:
The dividends received deduction (DRD) allows a company that earns dividends from another company, to deduct those earnings (dividends) from its income tax.
The three tiers of possible deductions are:
- If the company owns ≤20% of the second company, it can deduct 70% of the dividends received.
- If the company owns ˃20% but ≤80% of the second company, it can deduct 80% of the dividends received.
- If the company owns ˃80% of the second company, it can deduct 100% of the dividends received.
Since Crimson owned 15% of the second company, then it can deduct 70% of the dividends it received, which equals $21,000 ($30,000 x 70%).
Answer:
1.
c. $21
2.
b. $20
Explanation:
1.
In lower-of-cost-or-market comparison, the cost of the product and the realizable value of the product are compared and lower is used to value the available inventory.
In the given Scenario the realizable value of product Z is the recoverable value of the product.
Hence The replacement value of $21 should be used in the lower-of-cost-or-market comparison.
2.
Calculate the net recoverable value for the product Z
Net recoverable value = Selling price of product Z - Cost to sell product Z
Net recoverable value = $25 - $3 = $22
Now by comparing the cost and net realizable value the lower value is cost of $20.
Hence $20 will be used in order to value the inventory.
