A scientist plans to find out if dams harm a river ecosystem. He interviews 500 environmentalists and 450 of them believe that d
ams are harmful for the ecosystem. The scientist concludes that 90 percent of people believe that dams are harmful. Why is the scientist's conclusion most likely unreliable?
Answer: The answer is The source of information could be biased.
Explanation:
This is rather obvious like the person above stated environmentalists are more enclined to believe that humans with large-structures are harming the environment
A makes no sense, a lot of people were interviewed.
The scientists' conclusions are most likely unreliable because <u>he asked the wrong set of people for his survey.</u> By definition, environmentalists are those people who are inclined to believing that humans are entirely responsible for creating biological foot prints all over the Earth. They always advocate the protection of the environment and even persuade people to follow suit. It is natural for them to react in such a manner that they find dams as something harmful because to them, dams destroy the natural cycle of Mother Earth.
This cohesive relationship between the systems is known as pulmonary circulation. It helps the circulatory system in pumping the blood from the feet to the heart.
Repairing and replanting wetlands, creek beds, forestland, and other habitats. Eradicating invasive species. Replacing turf grass with native species. Planting rain gardens to absorb rainwater running off roofs or asphalt.
