5) The relation between intensity and current appears linear for intensity of 300 or more (current = intensity/10). For intensity of 150, current is less than that linear relation would predict. This seems to support the notion that current will go to zero for zero intensity. Current might even be negative for zero intensity since the line through the points (300, 30) and (150, 10) will have a negative intercept (-10) when current is zero.
Usually, we expect no output from a power-translating device when there is no input, so we expect current = 0 when intensity = 0.
6) We have no reason to believe the linear relation will not continue to hold for values of intensity near those already shown. We expect the current to be 100 for in intensity of 1000.
8) Apparently, times were only measured for 1, 3, 6, 8, and 12 laps. The author of the graph did not want to extrapolate beyond the data collected--a reasonable choice.
Answer:
A: 270 ,':)
Step-by-step explanation:
Answer:
help you
Step-by-step explanation:
I will help you on somethings
Answer:
250
Step-by-step explanation:
10 times as much as 25 equals:
10 * 25<em> </em>= ?
10 * 25 = 250
You just have to look for keywords and turn it into a [math] problem.
I hope this helps!
<h2><u>
PLEASE MARK BRAINLIEST!</u></h2>
If there is a decrease on y then that’s the answer
