Answer: correlational research finding
Explanation: correlational research helps to reveal relationships between variables. However, it's important to remember that correlation is not equal to causation.
Answer:linear; inductive
Explanation:
A linear worldview is a view in which one sees the world as working in certain orderly , progressive and particular way which is sequential from beginning to end.
Cyclical view on the other side views the world as uncertain
Inductive reasoning- is the reasoning in which conclusion is generalized based on observed events or situations. One collects the data and conclude from that data. It generalizes from specific situations. It doesn't follow that all premises need to be true for a conclusion to be true like in deductive reasoning , it just draws a conclusion that is is general even when not all premises are true.
Taylor is generalizing based only on the data of those who studied overseas and have got greater jobs.
I believe the answer is <span>It leads to an unequal distribution of wealth.
The capitalistic system favors the individuals who possess 2 things:
- Business ideas
- Resources/Capitals.
But in a capitalist system, the profit that generated by the business will all be belong to the capital owner (after being cut down by taxes) and other workers only receive the amount of salary that agreed upon before in the employment contract.</span>
Answer:
The Temple was looted and then destroyed in 586/587 BCE at the hands of the Babylonian king Nebuchadnezzar II, who also deported the Jews to Babylon. The destruction of the temple and the deportation were seen as fulfillments of prophecy and strengthened Judaic religious beliefs.
Explanation:
Inside this space rested the Ark of the Covenant, an ornate wooden box overlaid with gold. This was the most sacred relic in ancient Israelite religion. Inside of the Ark the Israelites kept the symbol of their covenant with Yahweh, the two tablets of the Ten Commandments, along with a pot of manna and Aaron's staff.
Third parties generally serve only to take votes from one of the main parties. Third parties generally serve only to take votes from one of the main parties. If the third party has a candidate promising similar things to the Rep. candidate, the Democrats are more likely to win simply because their votes are not being siphoned off. Think of it this way: if a school class were to vote on favorite colors and there were only blue and red to choose from, it would probably be mostly equal. But if the same class were to vote for blue, teal, and red, I would be willing to bet that red would win just because its votes weren't being split like the blue votes were. Teal is the third party. It won't ever win on its own, but it can be influential in that it can help the opposite party win.
