1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
8090 [49]
3 years ago
14

Compare and contrast the new england middle and southern colonies in an essay

History
1 answer:
murzikaleks [220]3 years ago
4 0

Answer:

The southern colonies and New England colonies were very same but somehow looks different. Moreover, these colonies grew not to like the same with the passage of time in 1619-1760's. There was many things different in the new England and southern colonies like style to lived, agriculture and economics. Furthermore, southern colonies and New England had a total 13 colonies, which were completely different from each other.  

New England colonies had the following things;

Rhode Island

Hampshire

Massachusetts Bay Colony

Rivers

Trees

The new England colonies are also called as the northern colonies. But the soil was very poor, which was not suitable for agriculture. Moreover, there was no religious freedom, which was the cause of many people left from there to practice their own religion with freedom. some people came to England to make money but not so many.

Explanation:

You might be interested in
What events lead up to the slave trade compromise
Anna007 [38]

Essentially, it had to do with political power. Slave-holding states wanted to include slaves who were unable to cast ballots in their political representation in Congress. Non-slave states perceived this as a ruse to exert influence over the newly formed government. This topic has been covered in a lot of writing. Contrary to some who assert that shows how the founders thought about black people, they address the problem of political representation. Since they now had more representation in the halls of government than the non-slave states, many in the slave states viewed this as a victory. Most individuals who opposed slavery simply wanted to count the free people in a population, but those who supported it wanted to count slaves as well. As a result, slave owners would be represented in the Electoral College and the House of Representatives by a greater number of seats. Numerous ratios were taken into consideration, including three-fourths, half, and one-quarter. James Madison would propose the Three-Fifths Compromise after much discussion. The Three-Fifths Compromise was not accepted by all of the states, and the Articles of Confederation needed a unanimous vote. As a result, the Compromise was not ratified until the Constitutional Convention. The Three-Fifths Compromise would dramatically increase slave-owning states' political clout and representation. If the Southern states had been represented equally, 33 seats in the House of Representatives would have gone to them. However, as a result of the Three-Fifths Compromise, the Southern states did have 47 seats in the House of Representatives of the first American Congress in 1790. As a result, by accumulating enough political influence, the South would be able to take control of presidential elections.

4 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Why was Mansa Musa's pilgrimage to Mecca so important to his kingdom of Mali?
AleksandrR [38]

Answer: He was determined to travel not only for his own religious fulfillment but also for recruiting teachers and leaders so that his realms could learn more of the Prophet's teachings. Musa was a devout Muslim, and his pilgrimage to Mecca made him well known across northern Africa and the Middle East.

Explanation:

7 0
2 years ago
Us constitution.
anastassius [24]

Answer:

answer number is 2

Explanation:

Each document contains articles about the legislative, executive, and judicial branches.

3 0
3 years ago
Sparta was the Greek city known for its great culture, arts and architecture <br> True<br> False
natta225 [31]
False, Sparta trained their children from a very young age to fight. They were known for their fighting abilities in combat.
4 0
2 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Can you state 3 conclusions about Spanish exploration and settlement north of Mexico and the Spaniards interaction with Native A
Naddika [18.5K]

One conclusion would be that the main goal of the Spanish in almost all cases was to find and bring back gold, another would be that the natives were demolished, and another would be that steel was their most valuable weapon. 


Explanation:

Some Native Americans regenerate to Christianity however others did not.

Early Spanish explorers fail to search out a lot of gold north of United Mexican States, therefore, a settlement was restricted to far off missions and defensive outpost.

Spanish missionaries gave native Americans with smart materials, education, and protection however generally abused them.

3 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • How did sanitation influence city planning during the Bronze Age in the Indus River valley?
    10·2 answers
  • Hey group dedicated to promoting civil rights were most likely focused on addressing which problems A.globalization B .mass migr
    11·2 answers
  • What was the key characteristic tha determined who recieved government jobs under the spoils system?
    12·1 answer
  • Select true or false San Francisco - San Diego is a megalopolis
    15·2 answers
  • Will give thanks and brainliest to first answer.
    7·2 answers
  • In a complete paragraph, describe the structure, function, and membership of a United States Senate Committee?
    9·1 answer
  • As a result of the Peloponnesian Wars __________.
    11·1 answer
  • Which is a trigger for asthma attack
    11·2 answers
  • How did president roosevelt respond to
    10·1 answer
  • Why was carniege different than other industry capatains
    11·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!