All categories

3 years ago

Which is not one of the financial costs of a recall? communication costs marketing costs legal costs engineering costs?

1 answer:

6 0

<span>Marketing costs are not a financial cost of a recall. Marketing involves the process of getting offerings out to consumers who would likely purchase the item (or whom the company would like to purchase the item). Here, with a recall, the company is not attempting to sell anything new, but rather, they are attempting to fix a manufacturing defect.</span>

You might be interested in

Dillon Labs has asked its financial manager to measure the cost of each specific type of capital as well as the weighted average

Whitepunk [10]

D!

Have an amazing day!

8 0

2 years ago

n a recent year's financial statements, home depot reported the following results. sales $ 95 billion net income 8 billion avera

faltersainse [42]

The home depot's return on assets is 19.05%

The home depot's return on assets is 8.05% better than the 11% return of lowe's

What is return on assets?

The return on on assets means the net income of Home Depot as percentage of the average total assets, in other words, the return on assets is the net income divided average total assets , not sales revenue, which is applicable to profit margin

return on assets=net income/average total assets

net income=8 billion

average total assets=42 billion

return on assets=8 billion/42 billion

return on assets=19.05%

difference in return on assets=19.05%-11

difference in return on assets=8.05%

The home depot's return on assets is 8.05% better than the 11% return of lowe's

Find out more about return on assets on:brainly.com/question/23554298

#SPJ1

3 0

2 years ago

Hyun's Handicrafts is a company that provides custom linens for both businesses and individual consumers. Hyun does not make any

Tom [10]

Answer:

Pull Strategy

Explanation:

The Pull Strategy is a marketing strategy which consists in having the customer seek the product by himself or herself.

The goal is to create consumer demand before kickstarting production.

In this case, we have a perfect example of a pull strategy, because Hyun will not start production unless it has proof of demand from a customer, the proof being a order.

8 0

3 years ago

You buy 100 shares in a no-load mutual fund at its net asset value of $10. during the year, the mutual fund distributes $0.75 in

Wittaler [7]

<span>Sale Proceeds of Mutual Funds = 100 Shares * $12.03 = $1203 Add: Dividend Earned on shares = 100 Shares * $0.75= $75 Less: Purchase cost of shares = 100 Shares * $10 = $1000 Less: Exit fees = $1203*5.5% = $66.17 Net Income from Investment = $211.83 Earning in %= $211.83 / $1000 = 21.18%</span>

5 0

3 years ago

Let's consider the effects of inflation in an economy composed of only two people: Bob, a bean farmer, and Rita, a rice farmer.

34kurt

Answer:

See below.

Explanation:

Lets first calculate inflation using the formula for Consumer Price Index

Inflation for a good = (Year 2 price - Year 1 price / Year 1 price) * 100

Using the above formula we can calculate inflation when Beans = $2 and Rice = $6.

Inflation for Beans = (2-1/1) * 100 = 100%

Inflation for Rice = (6-3/3) * 100 = 100%

Since each of them use rice and beans in equal proportions we assign them weights of 0.5 each,

Inflation Total = 0.5 * 100 + 0.5 * 100 = 100%

We assume Bob and Rita form a transnational relation and as such neither is worse off because the exchange rate between them remains the same,

Exchange rate before inflation = 3/1 = 3, Bob can buy 1 Rice by selling Rita 3 Beans.

Exchange rate after inflation = 6/2 = 3, so Bob can still buy 1 Rice by selling Rita 3 Beans.

B) For Prices 2 and 4 we use the above formulas,

Total Inflation = (2-1/1)*100*0.50 + (4-3/3)*100*0.50 = 66.66%

Bob is better off and Rita Worse off as the exchange rate for Bob has improved He can acquire 1 Rice for 4/2 = 2 Beans instead of 3 he needed before. Rita needs to sell him more to maintain her consumption but since they always consume same amount, she is worse off.

C) For Prices 2 and 1.5.

Total Inflation = (2-1/1)*100*0.50 + (1.5-3/3)*100*0.50 = (50-25) = 25%

Bob is now worse off and Rita better off as the Exchange rate change has favored Rita. Rita now only needs to sell 1 rice to obtain 2/1.5 = 1.3 units of Beans. Bob will have to sell more to maintain his initial consumption level.

Bob and Rita are more concerned with their rate of exchange which is the change in real terms. As long as the changes are proportional and there are no third actors in the economy model, the 2 agents are not affected at all. What matters to them is their transnational rate and not inflation on the whole in this case.

Hope that helps.

5 0

3 years ago