Answer:
false
Explanation:
The statement is false since:
Malthus <em>believed that population would keep increasing steadily at such a rate that, the means of its very subsistence would fell short.</em>
For it would be through war, disease, famine or a tragedy a way to return to the balance between the population growth and the actual number of resources to disposal.
<u>Today we are witnessing the tremendous effect of overpopulation, which together with world migration and wars and displacements are causing a wave of people to settle in the countries that previously had low population density. </u>Further social and ecological problems are posing threats to the life of many people to guarantee a standard of living and survival is kept.
Since Malthus say how exponential growth in population worldwide would need food and supplies that only increase arithmetically then a state of misery was to follow if nothing was planned to asses this situation.
There are only a few developed countries that have developed a social and economic structure capable of assuring the quality of life and survival for their citizens.