Answer:
The correct answer is option c.
Explanation:
If the demand for a product is elastic the tax burden will be borne by the producer. This is because elastic demand means that an increase in the price will lead to a more than proportionate reduction in the quantity demanded. So with the imposition of a tax, the sellers will not increase the price as it is likely to reduce demand.
If the demand is inelastic, it means that an increase in price will lead to less than a proportionate decrease in the demand. In this situation, after the imposition of tax, the tax burden can be shared between producer and buyer.
Based on the amount paid for the tickets and their fair value, the portion that is entitled to <u>charitable contribution deduction</u> is $75.
When one buys a ticket to a charitable event, there is a chance that some of the ticket price can be treated as a charitable contribution deduction.
The part that can be treated as such is anything in excess of the fair value of the ticket. This amount in this case is:
= 200 - 125
= $75
In conclusion, the answer is $75.
Find out more on <u>charitable contribution deductions</u> at brainly.com/question/8706786.
Answer:
The correct answer would be, Yes South Carolina would be compensating David as his property is now economically valueless.
Explanation:
Under the taking clause, 'The Beachfront Management Act was properly and validly designed to preserve South Carolina's beaches', which means that no one will be allowed to do any development project near beaches in order to save the beaches.
Though it is already written in the Act, The Beachfront Management Act barred any further development on the coasts of Carolina, which makes the purchased property of David as economically valuless, so South Carolina would be compensating him as the law has passed and they won't allow further development but they need to compensate the people who purchased the property on the beaches for the purpose of future business.
