The answer is:
e. She may go into debt.
As the insurance company agent already told her, she has no flood protection under her insurance which means that she will have to pay for everything that would happend because of that inconvenience, this means that she most probably would go into debt since she has already spent $2000 dollars just to pump out the water and repairing the hot water heater.
Answer:
The correct option is C: <em>The percentage of the general population whose level of exposure to animals matches that of a zoo employee is quite small.</em>
Explanation:
The correct option is C: <em>The percentage of the general population whose level of exposure to animals matches that of a zoo employee is quite small</em> because a zoo employee is, in general terms, in a high and constant contact with animals, so thinking about people who have had the same level of contact than them, which of course has to be small, and the possible presence of allergies in general population, we can consider the option that this percentage increases in function of the number of persons who have been asked for an answer. Thus, no matter the small level of coincidence between a zoo employee and a regular person, it could be a fact that is inferring what would happen if we make the study in bigger groups of interviewees.
<em>Option A: A zoo employee who develops a serious animal-induced allergy is very likely to switch to some other occupation</em> <u>can't be the true one</u> because we really don't know if a person who presents some kind of allergy will be sorting out his or her problem changing his or her workplace, also it doesn't have a relation with the percentage of people who could develop an allergy; <em>B option: A zoo employee is more likely than a person in the general population to keep one or more animal pets at home</em> <u>can't be true</u> because it is a generalization and it becomes the information hard to believe: we really couldn't affirm that just for working on a zoo, all the employees will be animal lovers. doesn't agree with the<em>Option D: Exposure to domestic pets is, on the whole, less likely to cause animal induced allergy than exposure to many of the animals kept in zoos </em> <u>doesn't agree with the presented information</u>, so it prevents us of affirming everything about domestic pets (finally there are animals too). <em>Option E: Zoo employees seldom wear protective gear when they handle animals in their care</em> is another generalization that <u>we shouldn't be considering </u>because the level of protective gear that a zoo employee has to use depends on the kind of animal that he or she is taking care of.
The women part is in feminism and liberalism is more broad.
Answer:
The answer is
radical feminism.
Explanation:
Radical feminism is the notion that tries to go further in challenging gender stereotypes and norms. It holds that liberal feminism is not critical enough because it fails to challenge the systematic nature of gender oppression and so misses the root causes. Radical feminism is becoming more mainstream as binary understandings of gender are being increasingly challenged by young people today. They are reconstructing traditional gender meanings and doing away with established gender norms.
Answer: An empire is a territory ruled by kings, queens, or pharaohs, Empires contain a widespread of people and have millions of people.
I hope this helps, I put an empire in my own words as best as I can! :)
