1answer.
Ask question
Login Signup
Ask question
All categories
  • English
  • Mathematics
  • Social Studies
  • Business
  • History
  • Health
  • Geography
  • Biology
  • Physics
  • Chemistry
  • Computers and Technology
  • Arts
  • World Languages
  • Spanish
  • French
  • German
  • Advanced Placement (AP)
  • SAT
  • Medicine
  • Law
  • Engineering
Firlakuza [10]
3 years ago
11

Political action committees focus on helping candidates who will support their causes true or false

History
2 answers:
Advocard [28]3 years ago
8 0

Answer:

TRUE

Explanation:

denis-greek [22]3 years ago
5 0

Answer: true

Explanation:

You might be interested in
What is one detail about how Martin Luther King Jr inspired others also I have to say where I got my information for the bibliog
Sati [7]

Answer:

https://www.britannica.com/biography/Martin-Luther-King-Jr   or go to www.britannica.com and search martin luther king jr

Explanation:

3 0
2 years ago
Which of the following examples shows the separation of powers and checks and balances of the Roman Republic?
Sergio039 [100]

Answer:

All of the choices are correct. The fact that Censors appointed, and could remove, senators;  Tribunes could veto laws; and Consuls were elected for one-year terms are examples of the separation of powers and checks and balances of the Roman Republic.

Explanation:

The Roman Republic was a political regime with a highly original approach. A regime that, despite all its political intrigues, reached almost 500 years. Probably, one of the reasons why it lasted so long is because it was a carefully balanced system. In this regard, the Greek historian Polybius said that Rome had a mixed government, fruit of a process that he called anacyclosis. It is known as such, to the succession of a series of political systems due to its irremediable tendency towards degeneration. Consequently, Rome knew a monarchy that degenerated into tyranny, also an aristocracy that ended up being oligarchic, until finally it reached a system closer to democracy.

In this way, the Roman Republic could contain features of these three political systems, thus giving it, according to Polybius, a certain superiority. Why? Because the main elements of the republic, which embody each of the three systems, must cooperate so that it works. For example, for a war, the consul - monarchy - will need, both a resolution of the senate -aristocracy- for the sending of legions, and the approval of the people (in elections) -democracy-, since it is whoever annuls or ratifies the armistices and treaties. In addition, the Senate will also depend on the people, because it is the people who, after the deliberation of the Senate, must approve those procedures in which there are crimes against the State that are punished with the death penalty. Likewise, the people will need the Senate insofar as this chamber is fundamental to carry out the public works that are first executed through the management of the town.  

What does the description described so far mean? Simply, that we are before a forerunner of the system of checks and balances. The current one, coming from Locke and Montesquieu, proposes a division between executive, legislative and judicial. But its old equivalent did not distinguish between powers, but forced an interorganic cooperation. In this way, in order to carry out certain competences, it might be necessary for two or more bodies to collaborate, thus preventing any of them from acting in a despotic manner. Meanwhile, there is currently a division of competence according to which each body has established guidelines, and the key to avoid despotism is precisely the opposite: that none of them interfere in the competencies of others.

5 0
3 years ago
Why did the Founding Fathers include the Bill of Rights with the Constitution?
grandymaker [24]

Answer: Because if they didn't add a bill of rights, then the anti-federalists wouldn't allow the constitution to be ratified.

Explanation:

See answer above

6 0
3 years ago
How was the united kingdom's treatment of czechoslovakia different from its treatment of poland in the years before world war ii
Naddik [55]
The United Kingdom allowed Germany to take over part of Czechoslovakia, but it came to Poland's defense when Germany invaded.
4 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
According to
stiv31 [10]

Answer:

yes idjdjdhdbsvshsbsbsbsbsbbsbsbs

7 0
3 years ago
Read 2 more answers
Other questions:
  • What was a result of actions taken by the house un-American activities committee
    8·1 answer
  • What did the Mexican government do to populate the territory of Texas?
    8·1 answer
  • Whom did the United States displace or deport during the Great Depression and World War II.
    6·1 answer
  • What did the term west referred to in the 1840s?
    9·2 answers
  • What made the Pennsylvania colony unique?
    7·2 answers
  • Which most accurately describes events during kublai khan's rule of the mongol empire (yuan dynasty)?
    11·2 answers
  • Education in sparta: did the strengths outweigh the weaknesses?
    7·1 answer
  • South Carolina’s leaders responded to the Stono Rebellion by
    5·2 answers
  • During World War II, the Allies were able to go on the offensive against Japan after
    5·1 answer
  • What is the major different between the Incas and the Phoenicians
    12·1 answer
Add answer
Login
Not registered? Fast signup
Signup
Login Signup
Ask question!