What can you conclude about the two triangles? why?
1 answer:
You might be interested in
Answer:
can not be expressed as a square of any other number.
Step-by-step explanation:
The number 1953125 is equal to .
Now, the above statement gives an idea that 1953125 i.e. is not a square number as 9 is not a multiple of 2.
So, we can not express as a square of any other number.
We can only express as
.
( Answer )
Answer: The complete question is found in the attachment
Step-by-step explanation:
Law of large numbers: The probability of occurrence of an event becomes closer to the theoretical probability as the number of trials increases
P(an ace) = 1/6
= 0.1667
= 16.67%
a) In 600 rolls, the value will be close to 16.67. compared to 60 rolls
Greater than 20% interval doesn't include 16.67%. So, for more than 20% ace, 60 rolls is better.
b) More than 15% interval includes 16.67. So, it is better to roll 600 times
c) The interval between 15% and 20% include 16.67% and hence, 600 rolls is better
d) Larger number of trials is better to get exactly 16
So, 600 rolls is better
