The correct answer is - Competition to develop strong economies and build large empires.
There were lots of tensions in Europe about the shares that each colonial country had on the other continents were the natural resources were abundant. While some considered that they had won this territories fair and square, others were on the opinion that they should get some of the colonies under their control. The background of this was of course the economy, and the competition between the nations to be wealthier, military stronger, and enlarge their territories. Unfortunately, these tensions led to a World War.
I’ll give you two:
Yes: The “War” on the Indians was not a traditional war of declaration but of skirmishes. When wagon trains of people headed West Indians would commonly target them for raids and pillage, so along many routes forts where built and patrols would try and make sure they were safe. If the problem became worse the local garrison would find the tribe and come with a list of demands. Most of the time they were fired upon arrival out of fear or anger. This would lead to a small battle or skirmish which would likely cause collateral damage.
No: The wars raged in the west against the Indians were that of near genocide, and to call it anything but is misleading. To claim that the slaughter of hundreds of innocent people was a “battle” is absurd and shouldn’t be considered. Though in films that depict such events are dramatized and inaccurate, situations much like those were taking place around the west yearly.
The basic principle of Marxism is, there should be equality. Karl Marx believed in a utopian society wherein people are equal and classless. But in order to achieve this utopian society, there are three phases that should happen. First, a revolution should take place. This is because of class stuggle. The rich often times exploit the working class and inequal distrubution of goods. Second, a new leader or dictator must lead. In order to achieve the utopian society, they must rid off the capitalist who are in the government. And lastly, a new government be created . They must create a government that follows the principles of socialism or equality.
C. Inevitable
They were going to need to expand any way because they were running out of room on the East coast
Answer:
The Puritans in Massachusetts Bay believed in a separation of church and state, but not a separa- tion of the state from God. The Congregational Church had no for- mal authority in the government. Ministers were not permitted to hold any government office. ... Puritan lawmaking touched all aspects of life.
