Yea me ether did you ever find the answer
W - a width
3w - a length
27 ft² - an area
Therefore:
w · 3w = 27
3w² = 27 |:3
w² = 9 → w = √9 → w = 3
3w = 3 · 3 = 9
width = 3
length = 9
The perimeter:
P = 2 · width + 2 · length
P = 2 · 3 + 2 · 9 = 6 + 18 = 24 ft.
B. miles because its a longer distance with leads to a smaller number
Answer:
A
Step-by-step explanation:
test the constant 1/2 + (1/2)*(-3) = -2/2 = -1
Answer:
Yes there is sufficient evidence.
Null hypothesis; H_o ; μ = 445
Alternative hypothesis; H_o ; μ ≠ 445
Step-by-step explanation:
The null hypothesis states that there is no difference in the test which is denoted by H_o. However, the sign of null hypothesis is denoted by the signs of = or ≥ or ≤.
Meanwhile, the alternative hypothesis is one that defers from the null hypothesis. This therefore implies a significant difference in the test. Thus, the signs of alternative hypothesis is denoted by; < or > or ≠.
Now, the question we have is a two tailed test. Thus;
The null hypothesis is;
bag filling machine works correctly at the 445 gram setting which is;
H_o ; μ = 445
The alternative hypothesis is;
bag filling machine works incorrectly at the 445 gram setting which is;
H_o ; μ ≠ 445
