Answer:
well if you look here it three times two times four times six
Answer: (A)
If both companies collude and agree on the best joint strategy, then neither of them will advertise.
Explanation:
If PM Inc. and Brown Inc. agree on a strategy that is best for both of them, then they would decide not to advertise as this line of action will earn them both $50 million, which is higher than they stand to earn if they both advertise.
Answer:
1. Which Statement is true:
B. low p/e ratio could mean that the company has a great deal of uncertainty in its future earnings.
2. Qualitative analysis:
According to your understanding, a company with less competition is considered to be (more or less) risky than companies with a wide multiple competitors.
Explanation:
Company A's Price/Earnings (P/E) ratio is calculated as the market price of its shares divided by the earnings per share. It shows the value investors have over a stock. With a high P/E ratio, the company's stock could be over-valued, or investors are expecting high growth rates in the future. This is unlike a low P/E ratio that shows that the stock is undervalued or that investors are not expecting high growth rates in the future because of uncertainty.
Without competition, Company A is riskier than Company B which operates efficiently and competitively. There is that competitive edge that competitive companies possess. Monopolies do not enjoy that advantage. It is, therefore, riskier to have no competition.
Answer:
The contract is void since it attempts to contract for services that are illegal
Explanation:
Since there is a contract between the Mr Green and Mr Blue and they already know that the Mr blue has already caught the number of crabs i.e permitted in the season but they agree to exceed the quota
Therefore the status should be void as they want to exceed which is not permitted that results in illegal service contracts
Hence, there is a void contract
The contract that contains provisions for surface leases related to a property is the <u>Farm</u><u> </u><u>and Ranch contract.</u>
<u />
A void contract is a contract that fails a validity test and is therefore not a contract. A void contract is a contract that initially appears valid but may be terminated by a party deemed to have interfered in some way.
<u />
After a reasonable period of time, the contract is considered accepted and can no longer be objected to. Other examples include real estate contracts, attorney contracts, etc. If a contract is concluded without the free consent of the parties, it will be considered a void contract.
A voidable contract is a formal agreement between two parties that can be made unenforceable for a variety of legal reasons, including Errors, Misrepresentations, or Fraud. Excessive influence or coercion.
Learn more about contracts here brainly.com/question/984979
#SPJ4
