The product of two positive numbers is 36. what is the smallest possible value of the sum of these numbers?
1 answer:
You might be interested in
Answer:
Step-by-step explanation:
The goal to solving any equation is to have x = {something}. That means we need to get the x out from underneath that radical. It's a square root, so we can "undo" it by squaring. Square both sides because this is an equation. Squaring both sides gives you
Get everything on one side of the equals sign and set the quadratic equal to 0:
Throw this into the quadratic formula to get that the solutions are x = 5 and -8. We need to see if only one works, both work, or neither work in the original equation.
Does ?
and
and 5 = 5. So 5 works. Let's try -8 now:
and
so
-8 = 8? No it doesn't. So only 5 works. Your choice is the third one down.
To solve the problem shown above you must apply the following proccedure:
1. You have the following function given in the problem:
<span> f(x)=x3–3x–2
2. When you give values to the x and plot each point obtained, you obtain the graph shown in the figure attached.
3. Based on the graph and analizing the alternate form:
f(x)=(x-2)(x+1)</span>²
As you can see, there is two roots x=-1, then, you can conclude that the correct answer is the option b, which is:
b) -1
<span>
</span>
1. You have the following function given in the problem:
<span> f(x)=x3–3x–2
2. When you give values to the x and plot each point obtained, you obtain the graph shown in the figure attached.
3. Based on the graph and analizing the alternate form:
f(x)=(x-2)(x+1)</span>²
As you can see, there is two roots x=-1, then, you can conclude that the correct answer is the option b, which is:
b) -1
<span>
</span>
Answer:
For this case the parameter of interest is given by:
who represent the true proportion of respondents said that they were willing to pay more for products and services from companies who are committed to positive social and environmental impact
For this case we have an estimation given for this parameter. The estimation comes from a sample of 30000 people selected in 60 countries and they got:
This value represent the best estimator for the true proportion since is an unbiased estimator of the real parameter:
Step-by-step explanation:
For this case the parameter of interest is given by:
who represent the true proportion of respondents said that they were willing to pay more for products and services from companies who are committed to positive social and environmental impact
For this case we have an estimation given for this parameter. The estimation comes from a sample of 30000 people selected in 60 countries and they got:
This value represent the best estimator for the true proportion since is an unbiased estimator of the real parameter:
For this case if we want to test if the population proportion is equal to an specified value we can use the one sample z test for a proportion:
Null hypothesis:
Alternative hypothesis:
When we conduct a proportion test we need to use the z statisitc, and the is given by:
(1)
The One-Sample Proportion Test is used to assess whether a population proportion is significantly different from a hypothesized value
.