The answer would be physical evidence
Physical Evidence ecompasses all objects that can establish or disprove whethe a crime has been committed or can lik a crime and its victim or perpetrator.
Physical evidence could be a finger prints, fire mark, foot prints, fiber, paints, building materials, receipt, saliva, sperm, etc
Took action that violated the criminal law
<u>Answer:
</u>
While introducing and explaining the relationships between anatomy and physiology, most time would be spent talking about the organ systems.
Explanation:
- Anatomy and physiology are two disciplines that serve as the soul of medical sciences.
- The common ground for both disciplines is the study of organ systems within the human body as anatomy is the science that dispenses information about the organs and their functions separately and physiology is the discipline in which the functional correlation between the organs is studied.
Answer:
Antisocial personality Disorder
Explanation:
When a person suffering from disregarding the rights of others by violating their rights. this behavior results in deceiving others by lying to them and acting impulsive towards people.Their behavior involves substance abuse with drug problem issues. People having this behavior normally have mood swing and like be involved in fighting at social clubs or anywhere theres a spotlight
Answer:
<h3>The comparison and contrast of Davis and Moore’s functionalist perspective of social stratification with Mosca’s conflict perspective of social stratification lies on the concept of social position and power.</h3>
Explanation:
Davis and Moore's functionalist perspective of social stratification and Mosca’s conflict perspective of social stratification all emphasize on the presence of a power structure in a society which directly corresponds to the position of an individual. They all believed that society operates according to the social needs and that every individual performs their tasks accordingly.
The line of distinction between Davis and Moore's functionalist perspective and Mosca’s conflict perspective lies in the nature of men. Mosca believes that man is evil and dominating by nature and that compels him/her to misuse his position. He brings out the authority and power of the ruling class as an example to this argument. He argues that people in good position will eventually become more powerful as men are ambitious and selfish. They will gradually exploit people from lower position and use their power for their own personal gains.
While on the other hand, Davis and Moore argue that the greater the role of an individual is, the greater should be the reward. They illustrate the idea that people with bigger and greater roles should be given more importance because of their greater contributions to the society. Their perspective of social stratification emphasize that not everyone can perform the exclusive task of the doctors, therefore those who could perform such complicated tasks should be paid and rewarded more. Davis and Moore do not consider misuse of position and power by people of great influence.
In my opinion, Davis and Moore’s functionalist perspective of social stratification is more applicable and realistic. The fact that those who worked hard deserves a reward is a universal doctrine. These people spent a lot of effort and time before acquiring the position they are in today. Their effort and hard work should be rewarded greatly as they will contribute significantly to the society. Though, this perspective does not bring into account the chances of misuse of power and position, such elements can be controlled through efficient law and state control.