Answer: The strength of the Neuropsychological approach is that "IT FOCUSES ON HUMAN BRAIN DAMAGED PATIENT". therefore the study of damaged human brain is the strength of the Neuropsychological approach.
The weaknesses of the Neuropsychological approach is that "IT USES A PREVIOUS CASE STUDY TO FOCUS ON HUMAN BRAIN DAMAGE". This means that he uses a previous case to conclude the solution of a recent brain damage.
Explanation: Neuropsychology is the study of psychological effect of a damaged brain in patient suffering from brain damage. It aim is to benefit the patient, by using previous case to study each case. It usually deals with case studies and quasi experimental.
Because it's optimum objective is to benefit it's patient, we can say that it's strength is stronger than its weakness.
The difference between a Republic and a Democracy is that the former is a representative form of government that is ruled according to a charter or constitution while the latter is the kind of government that is ruled according to the will of the majority. I hope this would help
Answer:
Yes
Explanation: The Articles established “the United States of America” as a perpetual union formed to defend the states as a group, but it provided few central powers beyond that. But it didn't have an executive official or judicial branch
Answer:
d. all of the above
Explanation:
Arbitration is a legal technique of resolving disputes outside the courts, whereby parties involved in the dispute refer it to an arbitrator (the "arbitrators", "arbiters" or "arbitral tribunal") or arbitrators( one or more persons) , by whose decision (the "award") they may be bound(as in mandatory arbitration) or not(as in voluntary or nonbinding arbitration).
The above methods of arbitration :peer review, arbitration, mediation all allow the dispute parties' input before arbitration decision. Peer review method involves dispute resolution in the workplace whereby employees are able to take disputes to fellow employees and managers to act as arbitrator to resolve disputes which may not be binding on the parties. Mediation on another hand is a dynamic method of dispute resolution where a third party helps to resolve disputes by helping dispute parties negotiate to resolve to dispute. Arbitration however differs from mediation in that the arbitrator makes decisions based on evidence presented and not waiting to negotiate an agreement between both parties. All three methods however require dispute parties to make inputs so as to arrive on final decision.
i believe that was the Almoravids
