Answer:
Opportunity cost is the cost of a foregone alternative. If you chose one alternative over another, then the cost of choosing that alternative is an opportunity cost. Opportunity cost is the benefits you lose by choosing one alternative over another one.
Hope it helps.
This would be true, I hope I helped
Answer:
C. national conventions for nominating presidential candidates
Explanation:
The progressives wanted the citizens to have as much influence as possible during the election of the president.
If presidential candidates were chosen by the national conventions, the political parties are the one that will decide which person can run as the presidential candidates. The citizens/voters have no say on it. This will increase the risk that the parties will only appoint nominees that serve the interest of the party, not the citizens.
This is why the progressives favor direct primaries, which enable the citizens to vote for the candidate that should run for the presidential election.
Answer:
The correct answer is letter b. social loafing.
Explanation:
In social psychology, the term social loafing describes a phenomenon that takes place when individuals work in a group instead of on their own. Social loafing is the tendency people show to exert less effort when working with others. This phenomenon explains why sometimes groups are less efficient and less productive than if the individuals were to work on their own and be responsible for their own productivity. That is the case with Michelle. Now that the group is larger, she is making less effort, being "content to sit back and let others do the work".
