A tuition difference between in-state and out of state students is an example of: How states make exceptions to the privileges and immunities clause.
<h3><u>What is in-state vs. out-of-state tuition?</u></h3>
The privileges and immunities clause emphasizes that a state cannot discriminatorily treat residents of other states. People from one state need to have the same rights in all of them. This is refuted by the tuition differential between in-state and out-of-state students.
- A student who resides permanently in the state where their university is situated is said to be paying in-state tuition. The cost that out-of-state students, including those from abroad, pay to attend a public state institution is referred to as out-of-state tuition.
- Typically, in-state tuition is far less expensive than out-of-state tuition.
- For instance, the School of Undergraduate Studies at The University of Texas at Austin costs residents of the state $5,624 for 12 or more credits. Out-of-state students pay $19,464 for the same courses, which is a difference of approximately $14,000.
To view more about state, refer to:
brainly.com/question/13487755
#SPJ4
Answer:
Internment is the imprisonment of people, commonly in large groups, without charges or intent to file charges. ... The term concentration camp originates from the Spanish–Cuban Ten Years' War when Spanish forces detained Cuban civilians in camps in order to more easily combat guerrilla forces.
Explanation:
Answer:
There are three types: six metropolitan, 56 municipal and 154 district assemblies. There are also sub-district political and administrative structures which are subordinate bodies of the assemblies. These include sub- metropolitan, district, urban, town, zonal and area councils, and unit committees.
Answer:
I would be a Federalist.
Explanation:
the main difference between the federalist and anti-federalists is on their opinion on how much power the central government should have over the states.
Federalist wanted the government to have more power and the anti-federalist wanted the government to have less power. In Hindsight, anti-federalists' idea sounds better. Since it will give the government less influence to disrupt the people.
But considering the issues that they faced at the time, I believe more government power was necessary.
The earlier draft of the constitution did not provide the central government with crucial power such as ability to collect taxes or create a centralized military. Both of those issues were supported by the Federalist.
Giving informed consent for a procedure
