Because Fredrick can not claim his father as a dependent then, the filing status that can Fredrick use is Single.
<h3>What is a filing status?</h3>
A filing status is a tax status that is used to determine a taxpayer's filing requirements, standard deduction, eligibility for certain credits, correct tax etc.
In conclusion, because Fredrick can not claim his father as a dependent then, the filing status that can Fredrick use is Single.
Read more about filing status
<em>brainly.com/question/1831273</em>
Answer: C - $30,000
Explanation: Johnston Company wants to double production of Product X from 1,000 units to 2,000 units.
The variable manufacturing cost per unit is $10. The variable non manufacturing cost per unit is $20.
The selling price per unit is $50
To increase production by 1000 units
Total cost is $10 + $20 = $30
Total incremental cost = 1,000 * $30= $30,000
Answer:
<em>Ratification by Principal One of the criteria for enactment is that all material truths involved in the transaction must be known to the Principal. Van Stavern was not aware of Hash's behaviour. </em>
He did not realize that somehow the steel is being shipped under his name, and that the shipments were being billed him directly. Unlike liability through obvious authority, approval by the principal is a positive act by which he or she acknowledges the agent's illegal actions.
Just a principal would ratify; thus, Van Stavern was not directly imputed to information by the invoices and checks signed by Van Stavern's workers.
The court stated that the use of corporate checks was further proof that Van Stavern regarded the expenditures as business, not private. So Van Stavern could not be held personally liable.
Remember that on Sutton Steel that's not excessively harsh. Sutton understood it was working with a building company and did not seek to get the personal approval of the contract from Van Stavern.
<em>Lawfully, Sutton's agreement in this case is called an unaccepted offer which can be withdrawn at any time.</em>
<em></em>
The correct answer to this open question is the following.
Although there is no further information about the case of study, we can say that the question possible refers to the case where the name of the company is just "The Client." The name of the document is "Leading Innovation Change - The Kotter Way."
This case refers to the challenges faced by an organization when it is time to innovate. Many members want to innovate but the culture of the company or the lack of proper leadership from managers often hinders the innovation efforts of the company.
So some of the elements of Kotter's Eight Stages of Leading Change that were included in the case were the following.
Create Urgency. The creation of new products of the company was limited and was not enough to compete in the future. A sense of urgency was needed to implement innovation.
Form a Powerful coalition. The company had to be very selective about the kinds of products that could help it to successfully compete in the future. The company had to use the best it had to establish priorities.
Create a vision for change. It was critical for the company to establish a new vision to get the results it needed. A renovation of the processes to face new necessities was imperative. Change has to be part of every member's mind.
Communicate the vision. This new vision had to be shared through the entire company. The members had to understand the importance of the innovative practices and each and every one of them had to be part of this new mentality.
