Both the cases, Plessy v. Ferguson and Brown v Board of Education, involved interpretation of the Fourteenth Amendment.
In Plessy v. Ferguson (1896), the Supreme Court decided that racial discrimination in accommodations was permissible. After 58 years, the Supreme Court ruled in Brown v. The Board of Education of Topeka (1954) that racial accommodations were fundamentally unfair and therefore unconstitutional.
The Plessy v. Ferguson ruling, which sanctioned the "separate but equal" practises, was overturned by the Brown decision, making it a significant legal precedent. According to the Plessy decision's interpretation of the 14th Amendment, segregated facilities might be used to achieve legal equality.
Know more about Plessy v. Ferguson here
brainly.com/question/12846797
#SPJ4
Answer:
A:3, B:1, C:2
Explanation:
1. Concurrent jurisdiction: Cases involving state and federal questions and cases.
2. Exclusive state jurisdiction: Cases involving all matters not subject to federal jurisdiction.
3. Exclusive federal jurisdiction: Cases involving federal crimes, bankruptcy, patents, copyrights, trademarks, and suits against the United States.
Concurrent jurisdiction arises in cases which can be heard in more than one court, it allows more than one court the authority to hear a case, for example divorce cases can be heard in a local district level court, a family court or any one of the district courts
Federal jurisdiction arise in cases involving federal crimes, bankruptcy, patents, copyrights, trademarks, and suits against the United States.
Exclusive state jurisdiction arises in cases not subject to federal laws but state laws
Answer:
its b
Explanation:
I've studied for biological
Answer:
Option B.
Explanation:
False, is the right answer.
The Dillon Rule is named after John Forest Dillon, a Chief Justice of the Supreme Court of Iowa. He was a personality who hugely suspected regional authorities and the local officials. Due to this distrust, he expressed his popular rule which was immediately adopted by state supreme courts throughout the state and was approved by the Supreme Court of Virginia before the 19th century. His rule interpreted the decisions when there is a problem of whether or not a regional government has a special potential.
Answer:
d. chunking.
Explanation:
Chunking is a process in psychology whereby bits of information are combined into meaningful units so that more information can be held in short-term memory.
