Because a triangle's angles need to equal 180, you can subtract 100(30+70) and you will get 80. So 80 will be your third angle.
Complete Question
The Brown's Ferry incident of 1975 focused national attention on the ever-present danger of fires breaking out in nuclear power plants. The Nuclear Regulatory Commission has estimated that with present technology there will be on average, one fire for every 10 years for a reactor. Suppose that a certain state has two reactors on line in 2020 and they behave independently of one another. Assuming the incident of fires for individual reactors can be described by a Poisson distribution, what is the probability that by 2030 at least two fires will have occurred at these reactors?
Answer:
The value is 
Step-by-step explanation:
From the question we are told that
The rate at which fire breaks out every 10 years is
Generally the probability distribution function for Poisson distribution is mathematically represented as

Here x represent the number of state which is 2 i.e 
Generally the probability that by 2030 at least two fires will have occurred at these reactors is mathematically represented as

=> ![P(x_1 + x_2 \ge 2 ) = 1 - [P(x_1 + x_2 = 0 ) + P( x_1 + x_2 = 1 )]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=P%28x_1%20%2B%20x_2%20%5Cge%202%20%29%20%3D%20%201%20-%20%5BP%28x_1%20%2B%20x_2%20%3D%200%20%29%20%2B%20P%28%20x_1%20%2B%20x_2%20%3D%201%20%29%5D)
=> ![P(x_1 + x_2 \ge 2 ) = 1 - [ P(x_1 = 0 , x_2 = 0 ) + P( x_1 = 0 , x_2 = 1 ) + P(x_1 , x_2 = 0)]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=P%28x_1%20%2B%20x_2%20%5Cge%202%20%29%20%3D%20%201%20-%20%5B%20P%28x_1%20%20%3D%200%20%2C%20%20x_2%20%3D%200%20%29%20%2B%20P%28%20x_1%20%3D%200%20%2C%20x_2%20%3D%201%20%29%20%2B%20P%28x_1%20%2C%20x_2%20%3D%200%29%5D)
=> 
=> ![P(x_1 + x_2 \ge 2 ) = 1 - \{ [ \frac{1^0}{ 0! } * e^{-1}] * [[ \frac{1^0}{ 0! } * e^{-1}]] )+ ( [ \frac{1^1}{1! } * e^{-1}] * [[ \frac{1^1}{ 1! } * e^{-1}]] ) + ( [ \frac{1^1}{ 1! } * e^{-1}] * [[ \frac{1^0}{ 0! } * e^{-1}]]) \}](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=P%28x_1%20%2B%20x_2%20%5Cge%202%20%29%20%3D%20%201%20-%20%5C%7B%20%5B%20%5Cfrac%7B1%5E0%7D%7B%200%21%20%7D%20%2A%20e%5E%7B-1%7D%5D%20%2A%20%5B%5B%20%5Cfrac%7B1%5E0%7D%7B%200%21%20%7D%20%2A%20e%5E%7B-1%7D%5D%5D%20%29%2B%20%28%20%5B%20%5Cfrac%7B1%5E1%7D%7B1%21%20%7D%20%2A%20e%5E%7B-1%7D%5D%20%2A%20%5B%5B%20%5Cfrac%7B1%5E1%7D%7B%201%21%20%7D%20%2A%20e%5E%7B-1%7D%5D%5D%20%29%20%2B%20%28%20%5B%20%5Cfrac%7B1%5E1%7D%7B%201%21%20%7D%20%2A%20e%5E%7B-1%7D%5D%20%2A%20%5B%5B%20%5Cfrac%7B1%5E0%7D%7B%200%21%20%7D%20%2A%20e%5E%7B-1%7D%5D%5D%29%20%5C%7D)
=> ![P(x_1 + x_2 \ge 2 )= 1- [[0.3678 * 0.3679] + [0.3678 * 0.3679] + [0.3678 * 0.3679] ]](https://tex.z-dn.net/?f=P%28x_1%20%2B%20x_2%20%5Cge%202%20%29%3D%201-%20%5B%5B0.3678%20%20%2A%200.3679%5D%20%2B%20%5B0.3678%20%20%2A%200.3679%5D%20%2B%20%5B0.3678%20%20%2A%200.3679%5D%20%20%5D)

Answer:
Between 1 and 3 seconds
Step-by-step explanation:
There is no change in distance ( change in y ) between 1 and 3, so she wasn't walking during that time
11a:
3x+5=5x-57
3x-5x=-57-5
-2x=-62
x=31
11b:
2x+2x+4x+150+4x+150=360
12x+300=360
12x=360-300
12x=60
x=5
hope this helped !!
Answer: OPTION C.
Step-by-step explanation:
In order to solve the given exercise, you can follow these steps:
1. Given the following function f(x):

You must substitute
into the function f(x). Then:

2. Evaluating, you get:

3. Now, the next step is to substitute
into the function g(x):

4. Finally, evaluating, you get the following result:

You can identify that it matches with the Option C.