Answer:
Debit Bad debt expense $19,000
Credit Allowance for doubtful debt $19,000
Explanation:
When a company makes sales on account, debit accounts receivable and credit sales. Based on assessment, some or all of the receivables may be uncollectible.
To account for this, debit bad debit expense and credit allowance for doubtful debt. Should the debt become uncollectible (i.e go bad), debit allowance for doubtful debt and credit accounts receivable.
Where a debit that had previously been determined to have gone bad gets settled, debit cash and credit bad debt expense.
Amount that may be uncollectible
= 4% * $600,000
= $24,000
Given that the Allowance for Doubtful Accounts has a $5,000 credit balance before adjustment, the additional amount to be adjusted for
= $24,000 - $5,000
= $19,000
Answer:
The correct answer is letter "C": both frictional unemployment and the natural rate of unemployment.
Explanation:
Natural unemployment is defined as the lowest rate of unemployment an economy will reach. It is called natural because its causes are other than an adverse economy. Natural unemployment is a combination of <em>frictional unemployment</em> -employment transitions, <em>structural unemployment</em> -mismatch between abilities and current position, and <em>labor surplus</em>.
Unions are groups of individuals who join to set minimum standards at work in regards to wages, compensations, and conditions. <em>Union members are, by default, always available to join the workforce even if there is work to be done or not. Sometimes, union members are assigned duties their abilities outperform just to avoid having the member unemployed. These are the reasons why unions are said to contribute to natural unemployment.</em>
Answer:
C. Researcher
Explanation:
The PHS or Public Health Service regulations established specific rules created in order to increase accountability, implement transparency, and even increase regulatory compliance and management of financial conflicts of interest which require researcher party to disclose significant financial conflicts of interest
Answer:
Option c. is correct
Explanation:
Under the Golsen rule, the Tax Court must follows the Court of Appeals such that the court of appeals has direct jurisdiction over the taxpayer. The Court is said to reach a decision without calculating the tax when a Tax Court decision is said to be entered under Rule 155.
In this question, The Golsen rule applies here and weakens the legal justification for the deduction
