Answer:
Explanation:
The firm Should decrease the output.
Because as we see selling price P is LESS than Marginal Cost (MC) and in perfect competition P=MC for efficient allocation . So By decreasing output firm can decrease MC ⇒ which leads to output where P=MC.
Jeremy wants to avoid conflict with his new coworkers. He should treat them all with respect.
Option B is correct answer.
Conflict in workplace :
Conflict is a difference or disagreement between two or more people. Conflict in the workplace is a normal part of human interaction, yet, handling and resolving conflicts that arise is probably one of the biggest challenges employees face.
What is good conflict in the workplace?
Positive conflict is constructive in nature. It produces new ideas, solves continuous problems, provides an opportunity for people and teams to expand their skills, and fosters creativity. When opposing ideas are explored, a breakthrough of thinking can occur.
Learn more about workplace conflicts :
brainly.com/question/17112762
#SPJ4
Answer:
b. constant returns to scale because average total cost is constant as output rises.
Explanation:
The question has options. Below is the complete question.
<u>Complete Question</u>
In the long run a company that produces and sells kayaks incurs total costs of $15,000 when output is 30 kayaks and $20,000 when output is 40 kayaks. The kayak company exhibits
a. diseconomies of scale because total cost is rising as output rises.
b. constant returns to scale because average total cost is constant as output rises.
c. diseconomies of scale because average total cost is rising as output rises.
d. economies of scale because average total cost is falling as output rises.
The correct answer is explained below.
In the long run a company that produces and sells kayaks incurs total costs of $15,000 when output is 30 kayaks and $20,000 when output is 40 kayaks. The kayak company exhibits constant returns to scale because average total cost is constant as output rises.
Answer:
The correct answer is the option C: Clarification and justification.
Explanation:
To begin with, in the stage of <em>clarification and justification</em> of the negotiation process the parties do not need to be argumentative but instead they need to be educative to each other by showing the other what are the reasonable statements that are established in order to proove their positions on each argument done before. That is why, in this stage the positions of each party are discussed at length in order to comprehend what every party is supporting for and that is why this stage is called of ''justification''.
